Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

J TA. Trial 1 Trial 2 Mass of evaporating dish Mass of ing dish and m 9.62 Mass

ID: 1051707 • Letter: J

Question

J TA. Trial 1 Trial 2 Mass of evaporating dish Mass of ing dish and m 9.62 Mass of evaporating dish and dried product 50. %e9 10' magnesium chloride Mass of dried magnesium 1.1114 Mass of chloride product 2.252 magnesium metal Moles of magnesium atoms. Mass of chlorine Moles of chlorine atoms Ratio of moles of magnesium atoms moles of chlorine atoms (as decimal fraction) divide by the molar mass for CL not molar mass for Ci2 Average ratio of moles of magnesium to moles of chlorine, expressed as a fraction xy with x and y being small whole numbers Empirical formula of magnesium chloride Questions to address in your conclusion: 1. What is the expected mole ratio of chlorine to magnesium in the reaction product based on the known formula of the compound magnesium chloride? (f you don't know the formula, you can look it up.) 2. Give a possible explanation of why your experimentally determined mole ratio of chlorine to magnesium in the product does not match the expected ratio xygen in the air in the tume hood. could potatalu incre the mass the Anal product, 3. Do you feel that either ofyour two trials may have produced more accurate results than the other? If so, state your reasons according to the observations you made during the two trials. I trial 2 eras mone acurate because hloride lett. been m nesium otros rod Mom stran 49

Explanation / Answer

You are in right way.

your calculationns are also right .

One thing i would like to suggest see that the product sholud be dry well.

Go head.

o