Choose ONE of the two questions below to answer. Need ONE-page essay format with

Question

Choose ONE of the two questions below to answer.

Need ONE-page essay format with ONE reference:

1. What is fundamentalism? What are the common elements across religions? What do anthropologists think gives rise to fundamentalism? Do you think this applies to our society today? Explain how. What would you predict about the direction that religion might take in the U.S.? Please support your answer.

OR

2. In what societies are people likely to believe in monotheism? How does Swanson explain this? In what kinds of societies are gods likely to intervene to punish people and what kinds of societies do the gods have little or nothing to do with human morality?

Explanation / Answer

Fundamentalism:

Fundamentalism  includes a non secular connotation ,it indicates unwavering attachment to a group of irreducible beliefs.The Protestantism has come back to be applied to an inclination among bound teams chiefly, tho' not solely, in faith that's characterised by a markedly strict literalism because it is applied to bound specific scriptures, dogmas, or ideologies, and a powerful sense of the importance of maintaining lot and outgroup distinctions, resulting in a stress on purity and also the want to come to a previous ideal from that advocates believe members have strayed. Rejection of diversity of opinion as applied to those established "fundamentals" and their accepted interpretation among the cluster is commonly the results of this tendency.

The common elements across religions:

1)Beliefs

2)Religious organisation

3)Emotions

4)Ritual and ceremonies

5)sacred objects

6)symbols

7)sects.

Anthropologists think gives rise to fundamentalism:Anthropological purpose of read will clarify in non secular Protestantism one will verify Huntington’s a couple of clash of civilization. He depicts an image wherever weak civilization feel vulnerable, resulting in inevitable conflict and wherever globalisation is that the fertile ground required for these conflicts , as Mamdani points out, this vision forgets that Islam isn't uniform which all Muslims don't have identical civilization moreover, nothing is static and cultures civilizations have perpetually been, and still be, concerned within the dynamic method of amendment . Anthropologists see the processes concerned in globalisation as associate “open-ended, doctrine method, with several parts, and replete with interior contradictions that generate new sets of relationships” and no-one is aware of wherever this can lead U.S.A. humans The aim of social science isn't to create predictions for the long run, however to create folks notice however the dynamics work which at the core of these dynamics lie the folks themselves. What journalists write and report within the media is influenced by several factors like their access to native info, the necessity for exciting and audience-pleasing stories and therefore the quantity of your timethey'll pay on one story, part to secure their careers. However, these area unit the sort of approaches to situationswhich might result in seeing Protestantism all over. thanks to it’s deep understanding supported quality instead of amount, the social scientist will teach folks the extent of their personal participation within the dynamics that surround U.S.A., further because the importance of their own understandings and perceptions of the planet as these area unit a part of the inventive processes that build the planet.Anthropology appearance at the method individuals build their worlds. . This helps US perceive the anchorage of Protestantism within the narrowness of interpretation of the Word that some humans like better to have, perhaps as a defense against the threat they feel emanating from the increasing presence of fundamentals happiness to alternative humans from elsewhere. social science makes US understand that RF isn’t the action of evil humans, however a part of a method coupled with alternative international processes like manufacture and urbanization.. social science, by giving a clearer insight within the development, makes the perceiver perceive his own role within the categorization and therefore the creating of RF, and therefore the fight, if a fight is required, against the $64000 causes of spiritual Protestantism might begin.

Idon,t think it applies to our society today.

It might somewhat be not possible to predict the “turn of the soul” for one individual, coupled with that of a complete community. In many ways the longer term of the Catholic Church within the U.S. are going to be obsessed with its future elsewhere within the world. can there be an oversized, welcoming, liberal Church following the instance of Pope Francis and presumably even additional reformist coming back popes can there be a Church that attends to the beliefs of most yankee Catholics or can the church become ever additional conservative
The moments may we tend to miss that appear obvious to our future historiographer we are going to she compose some unexpected future nice arousal of evangelical fervor in yankee society would like this nice arousal be reactionary, or might or not it's progressive or even as national political status and a way of yankee exceptionality withers individuals can replace our civil faith for Mormonism, with Americans grasp the church’s American-centered cosmology and stable sense of family values. It’s the most important non secular tradition really birthed in America and remains one among our quickest growing faithscould or not it's potential that the twenty initial century sees Mormonism changing into America’s dominant religion.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse C
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.