The role of reason in critical thinking is: It leads us to the truth almost ever

Question

The role of reason in critical thinking is: It leads us to the truth almost every time. It makes us win arguments. It helps us analyze beliefs and evidence. It makes changing the current system possible. Which of the following is a way to commit the fallacy of hasty generalization. drawing a general conclusion from a sample that is too small concluding something about an entire group from a sample drawing a general conclusion from a randomly selected sample all of these are ways of committing the fallacy of hasty generalization Which of the following is d promise indicator? therefore When we rationalize to justify our past actions, and ignore competing claims, we can get caught up in holding two contradictory views while believing both to be true. This is referred to as ____ doublethink avoidance e denial anger Which of the following is a premise indicator? therefore since or thus

Explanation / Answer

1) the role of reason in critical thinking is that it help us analyze belief and evidence.

It is beacuse when we think critically and logically we are just taking the case in a way of logistics understanding by joining different concepts of evidence together. take an example like the judge in court make the decsion to punish the culprit after listening to the both parties. then he analyse logically on the belief and evidences rather to make decision according to views of just believing.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2) it is the case of avoidance

it is because to the fact that when there are situations which enable us to switch on the situation but we are ignoring the actual and reality of the truthness and do not want to claim upon that. also we are rationlize to justify our past actions that what we have done. to prevent from these, we make avoidance of the situaions.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3) the fallacy of generalization is a fallacy in which the concusion or argument is not logically justified by sufficient information or related sample. so it can be considered as a way to commit the fallacy of hasty generalization is the drawing a general conclusions from a sample that it too small. so first choice is correct.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4) the word which is a premise indicator is "since"

it is because the word since is used in a phrase where we have to conclued the situation of logical understanding. suppose the case of an example that since carrot rich in vitamins, which means the word playing a role of conclusion and make us understand the santance in a premise order.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse T
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.