Why was/were the firm(s) investigated for antitrust behavior? Identify some of t

Question

Why was/were the firm(s) investigated for antitrust behavior? Identify some of the costs (pecuniary and nonpecuniary) associated with the antitrust behavior (firms having power in the market). Additionally, note the specific antitrust act (Sherman Act, Clayton Act, etc.) under which the violation was investigated. Given your research and findings, are monopolies and oligopolies (firms demonstrating power) always bad for society? Be sure to provide real world examples of where this may be the case to strengthen your position. Provide at least one example of a case where having a monopoly or oligopoly may actually benefit the society

Explanation / Answer

Case

I consider the case of Microsoft, which was investigated for antitrust behavior. Microsoft is a largest software manufacturing company having one of the highest valuations in the world. It manufactures windows required for an operating system of servers and personal computers. Since 1991 the Microsoft has been investigated many times for the violation of antitrust laws particularly for Sharman Antitrust Act. The litigant alleged that the Microsoft misused its monopoly power on personal computer based on Intel while handling sales of its operating system and web browser. The issue of content was whether Microsoft should be allowed to bundle its internet explorer web browser with its operating system. It was alleged that it is the bundling of this web browser with its operating system which allowed Microsoft to get victory in the browser wars as copy of internet explorer was available with every window user. Also the question was whether Microsoft manipulated or altered the programming of its applications to give favor to Internet Explorer over web browser of any other third party and restricting options available to consumers in the market. These facts implies that Microsoft was trying to gain computer software industry since bundling of internet explorer web browser with its operating system might have provided a monopoly power to Microsoft over these product.

Costs associated with Anti-trust behavior

Firms having market power can regulate the market on their own terms. They will have freedom to charge any price from the customers. Therefore, they would often charge higher prices from the consumers and produce less as compare to the competitive outcome, resulting in net welfare loss for the society. Further, due to lack of competition, firm

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse W
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.