1. It is argued that the United States would be foolish to maintain a free-trade

Question

1. It is argued that the United States would be foolish to maintain a free-trade stance in a world in which all other countries exploit child or prisoner labor, or are protectionist. On the other hand, Ricardo's classic demonstration of the sources and effects of comparative advantage cogently demonstrates that regardless of other country policy, free trade remains the first best policy for a country to follow, since it will maximize its consumption possibilities (conditional upon other country policies). Explain.

Discuss the contradiction with the argument in the preceding paragraph.

For credit, provide clear arguments to support your claim

Please i already have this answer from other sites so DO NOT just copy and paste them. is there any other explanations for this answer?

please make sure your answer is CLEAR AND VISIBLE to everyone thanks

Explanation / Answer

:

In the context of the Ricardian model, it is true that gains from trade are strictly a result of world terms of trade, which differ from domestic marginal rates of substitution. In such a world, the reason why foreign goods are cheap is of no concern to domestic consumers. However, in a world which allows for large-scale labor migration, ignoring labor conditions abroad may ultimately result in living standards for domestic workers to be dragged down.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse 1
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.