In 2014, California was in its third year of a major drought. With water supplie
ID: 1132145 • Letter: I
Question
In 2014, California was in its third year of a major drought. With water supplies dwindling, Governor Brown issued a plea for a voluntary 20 percent reduction in water use. This target was not reached. In early 2015 Governor Brown issued an executive order requiring local water agencies to reduce water use by 25 percent, but no enforcement mechanism was specified. No taxes or fines were in the executive order. State officials hoped that they could achieve compliance without resorting to fines.
a.From an individual homeowner’s perspective, what are the costs and benefits of using water during a drought? Why do you think that the voluntary reduction order in 2014 didn’t work?
b.Using concepts from this chapter, explain how you might get individual homeowners to reduce water use during a drought.
c.Eventually, many communities began levying fines on water use. However, while many middle income families dramatically cut water use, wealthy households cut back their water use relatively little. How can you explain this phenomenon from an economic perspective?
Explanation / Answer
A
Water is critical for homeowners during the drought. During the drought, benefits of water become more acute and important. Costs come in form of high prices and depletion of resources.
B
Through creating public awareness about the water and imposing high prices would indeed reduce the water supply.
c.
Middle class is likely to cut the demand for water drastically if government levies tax. Demand for water is high elastic since larger portion of income is spent on it. On other hand, rich class spends smaller portion of income on water, hence demand for water is inelastic.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.