EPI or Environmental Policy Integration is used as a key policy element in monit

Question

EPI or Environmental Policy Integration is used as a key policy element in monitoring a political authority’s transition to sustainability. It aims to turn the policy status quo so that environmental protection involves a more HOLISTIC and PROACTIVE approach. Jordan and Lenschow suggest the change in policy approach would be innovative because it attempts to revise the traditional hierarchy of policy objectives where economic concerns were a higher priority than environmental or sustainable goals. Environmental and sustainable goals remained minor concerns when evaluating economic growth policies.

Therefore, as a business leader, sustainable policy consultant, or government administrator it is important to infuse or integrate sustainability principles into other types of government policies, such as housing development, attracting businesses to local places or protecting tourism destinations from ecological destruction while maintaining reveneus.

1) Efficiency is an important measure to evaluate the impact of a sustainable policy. Which type policy, EI or CAC is more efficient? That is, which one costs less to implement?

2) Which type of policy has higher administrative costs, EI or CAC?

3) Which type of policy instrument achieves their objectives quicker, EI or CAC?

4) Which type of policy instrument would private enterprises likely oppose and support if the governing authority instituted EI and CAC sustainable policy strategies?

Explanation / Answer

CAC is more efficient in measuring the efficiency and can be cost effective because of the proven methods available in science. These methods are derived from the previous environmental issues and solutions of other areas. So, distinguishing what is legal and illegal is an easy task and provides a clarity towards the goal and cost. EI has higher administrative costs as the work involved in estimating the environmental issues in a particular area may shoot the budget up in many cases. CAC policy instruments achieve the objectives quicker. The reason is the strong power held in the administration to execute the tasks. CAC will be opposed by private enterprises as it cuts the cost and improves time delays. Most of the private enterprises are dependent upon financial ideologies. This may hinder their business goals.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse E
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.