2123B 570 × 1:06 e/afa98a5e-b4do-46a4-9286-511192a00680/tool uestion 5 of 18 1.0

Question

2123B 570 × 1:06 e/afa98a5e-b4do-46a4-9286-511192a00680/tool uestion 5 of 18 1.0 Points lf a null h pothesis is rei cted in favor of the alternative at the 5% level of sig ificance, then using the same data, t must be re cted in favor of the a ative at the 1% level C. The False Mark for Review What's This? Part 6 of 18-Q5 1.0 Points lf a null hypothesis is rejected against an alternative at the 5% level and at the 1% level, then you Reporting that it was also rejected at the 5% is redundant and not recommended. True should eport that the null was nected at ne si sgtere ener False Reset Selection Mark for Reviewymatsnis?

Explanation / Answer

Question 5

Statistical significance of the result at 1% significance level is higher than the result at 5% significance level.

So, if null hypothesis is rejected at 5% significance level then with same data set there is no way it would be accepted at higher level that is 1% significance level.

So, it will be rejected at the 1% level of significance as well.

Thus, the given statement is true.

Hence, the correct answer is the option (1).

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse 2
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.