Is the official U.S government definition of poverty an adequate one? Does it un
ID: 1189037 • Letter: I
Question
Is the official U.S government definition of poverty an adequate one? Does it understate the true extent of poverty? Does it overstate it? How might the measure of be improved? The Census Bureau (http://www.census.gov) has begun recording poverty statistics with alternative definitions of poverty. Check out the Web site. Is the official U.S government definition of poverty an adequate one? Does it understate the true extent of poverty? Does it overstate it? How might the measure of be improved? The Census Bureau (http://www.census.gov) has begun recording poverty statistics with alternative definitions of poverty. Check out the Web site.Explanation / Answer
The U.S. Government measures poverty by a restricted wage standard that does exclude different parts of monetary status, for example, material hardship (for instance, living in substandard lodging) or obligation, nor does it consider budgetary resources (counting investment funds or property). The official neediness measure is a particular dollar sum that changes by family estimate, however are the same over the mainland U.S. As per the rules, the destitution level in 2008 is $21,200 a year for a group of four and $17,600 for a group of three. The 'requirement' rules are utilized to focus qualification for open projects. A comparative yet more perplexing measure is utilized for figuring neediness rates.
The flow poverty measure was set up in the 1960s. It depended on examination demonstrating that families spent around 33% of their earnings on sustenance – the official neediness level was set by duplicating food costs by three. From that point forward, the figures have been upgraded yearly for swelling yet have generally stayed unaltered
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.