I am expected to read Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc., 293 F.R.D. 516, (
ID: 1207814 • Letter: I
Question
I am expected to read Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc., 293 F.R.D. 516, (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 22, 2013). I also need read its follow up decision that modified the previous decision on other grounds on reconsideration, 2013 WL 4834428 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 22, 2013). Both are provided below. I need to summarize the decision. Based on the court's ruling, should unpaid interns be considered employees? Do you agree with the court's ruling? Why or why not? The report should be 1-2 pages in length, double-spaced, using 12-point Times New Roman font. You will be graded exclusively on the following criteria: 25 points for demonstration of reading and understanding the decision; 15 points for providing your opinion with compelling support; and 10 points for spelling and grammar.
Those files are able to correct in Google.
P.S I need to summarize based on that case, if any one can just review on the internet datas , and give me a good 2 pages summarized paper that would be great too.
Thank you
Explanation / Answer
First of all we must understand one thing here
1) How can there be existance of unpaid interns, Even if you are an intern you must be paid atleast hourly as you are already working in that company
The clause of unpaid intern is void in court of law, This clearly is given in the court ruling. The appealent Glatt has told the court that he was employed by search light, which the search light denies and says you are an unpaid intern.
The key accusition is nothing but the unpaid interns were treated like employees and made to work in the company which otherwise would have to pay for that work to be done by paid employees, This is clear violation of law, Interns are there to learn not to work as fulltime employees in your organization.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.