As certain case studies seem to suggest, it is possible for non-violent protest

Question

As certain case studies seem to suggest, it is possible for non-violent protest to be effective in authoritarian countries for the following reasons: 1) non-violence is capable of disrupting the pillars of support that keeps the government in power, 2) it has the potential to influence a change in ideology and 3) it reduces the chances of additional government oppression that usually stems when violence is used in protest. As certain case studies seem to suggest, it is possible for non-violent protest to be effective in authoritarian countries for the following reasons: 1) non-violence is capable of disrupting the pillars of support that keeps the government in power, 2) it has the potential to influence a change in ideology and 3) it reduces the chances of additional government oppression that usually stems when violence is used in protest.

Explanation / Answer

1) non-violence is capable of disrupting the pillars of support that keeps the government in power, 2) it has the potential to influence a change in ideology and 3) it reduces the chances of additional government oppression that usually stems when violence is used in protest

All reasons are correct.

If you want to ask something else and i misjudged the Questionas MCQ then Comment, I'ill revert back on the same.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse A
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.