Which of the following was the result in Choices in Cmty. Living Inc., v. Petkus

Question

Which of the following was the result in Choices in Cmty. Living Inc., v. Petkus, the case in the text, the case in the text in which the plaintiff alleged that the defendant violated the Fair Housing Act (FHA) by discriminating against the cognitively disabled in the provision of housing?

A-That the defendant did not violate the FHA because the defendant established that more desirable renters than the disabled applicants at issue were willing to rent the property at issue.

B- That the defendant did not violate the FHA because zoning regulations prevented renting the dwelling at issue to three or more unrelated people as requested.

C- That the defendant did not violate the FHA because of the reasonable belief on the part of the defendant that the proposed renters would commit substantial waste and damage.

D- That the defendant violated the FHA.

E- That the defendant did not violate the FHA because the FHA only prohibits discrimination against the physically disabled, not individuals who have cognitive disabilities.

Explanation / Answer

The correct answer is option (A). That the defendant did not violate the FHA because the defendant established that more desirable renters than the disabled applicants at issue were willing to rent the property at issue.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse W
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.