Answer all 3!!!! 1.Birkland argues that the “underwear bomber” case tipped the b
ID: 1218211 • Letter: A
Question
Answer all 3!!!!
1.Birkland argues that the “underwear bomber” case tipped the balance in favor of using screening machines that showed a clearer image of a screened passenger’s body under his or her own clothes
2. Take a position on the following question and provide support for your position: Do you agree that public sentiment supports the use of such machines?
3 Does the failed attempt to bomb Northwest Airlines flight 253 in 2009 (“underwear bomber”) reflect policy failure or policy success? Support your position with two types of evidence.
Explanation / Answer
1) and 2) In reading the case of the “underwear bomber”, I am in favor of using thescreening machines that shows a clear image of passenger’s body parts.If a bodyscanner can save countless of lives and prevent terrorism then I am all for it.Ibelieve it is necessary, for them to ensure that citizen are not embarrassed if sothey should have a private area where they will have the citizen walk through.Ibelieve the other benefit of these machines will also stop drug mules fromsmuggling illegal drugs in our country.Or any other illegal items that are broughtin our country daily.Even though it is an invasion of privacy, they are there toprotect us from the unknown.I feel these scanners should not just be at theairport but be implemented, boat, train, bus any where the public goes.We haveto stop being so ignorant and realize that there are people who wish to do harm tous. They are willing to take the time and risk their lives just to do harm to us.Wehave people who are trying their best to keep us safe. Instead of us complaining,we must join them in the fight of terrorist attacks on the United States
we can answer one question per post, however i asnswered two above
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.