Suppose there are two policy options facing a vote in the Senate. In the first,

Question

Suppose there are two policy options facing a vote in the Senate. In the first, government spending will increase $50B, while the second option is to cut taxes by $50B. A Keynesian economist would argue for, A) the spending option because it has a bigger impact on total spending. The spending directly raises total spending plus it works throught multiplier, which the tax cut only works throught the multiplier, B) the spending option because it won't affect the deficit the way the tax cut would, C) the tax option because it also affects the incentives workers face. Long-run aggregate supply will increase with the tax cut, but not with the spending increase, and D) the tax option because it is easier to pass. The effects on total spending would be identical?

Explanation / Answer

B) the spending option because it won't affect the deficit the way the tax cut would,

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse S
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.