Some people believe that the World Trade Center collapse of September 11, 2001 w

Question

Some people believe that the World Trade Center collapse of September 11, 2001 was caused, not by foreign terrorists, but by high ranking American officials. The plotters, the story goes, wanted to make sure that the buildings fell (because plane strikes alone wouldn't accomplish their objectives?) and brought the towers down via pre-arranged, controlled demolitions. This explanation has several flaws. Which of the following criticisms favors the official account on grounds that parts of the conspiracy are unfalsifiable?

The thermite that was supposedly used to bring down the towers leaves no trace. It would be impossible to discover that thermite had not been used since there is no method of detecting it. This is a demerit of the conspiracy, rather than a merit.

The conspiracy theory would involve thousands of people at all levels of government being knowingly involved in a great evil, and it would further require that no one involved would admit to involvement even after seeing the devastating harm caused by their actions. Furthermore, it would require dozens of nations, agencies, organizations, and officials working (without leaks) with hundreds of media outlets to cover up the truth.

The conspiracy theory is heavily reliant on eyewitness testimony. Some people at the scene claim to have heard explosions when the towers came down. It seems to be a mistake to rely on the impressions of onlookers (to distinguish collapsing building sounds from explosion sounds) in such a hectic environment.

There is no real motive for such an attack. The conspiratorial explanation is that the attacks were a pretext for war to obtain oil. Generally, war is undesirable for political leaders and furthermore there has long been precedent for the commitment of American forces without any prior attack on the U.S. Also, there is very little extractable oil in Afghanistan.

The thermite that was supposedly used to bring down the towers leaves no trace. It would be impossible to discover that thermite had not been used since there is no method of detecting it. This is a demerit of the conspiracy, rather than a merit.

The conspiracy theory would involve thousands of people at all levels of government being knowingly involved in a great evil, and it would further require that no one involved would admit to involvement even after seeing the devastating harm caused by their actions. Furthermore, it would require dozens of nations, agencies, organizations, and officials working (without leaks) with hundreds of media outlets to cover up the truth.

The conspiracy theory is heavily reliant on eyewitness testimony. Some people at the scene claim to have heard explosions when the towers came down. It seems to be a mistake to rely on the impressions of onlookers (to distinguish collapsing building sounds from explosion sounds) in such a hectic environment.

There is no real motive for such an attack. The conspiratorial explanation is that the attacks were a pretext for war to obtain oil. Generally, war is undesirable for political leaders and furthermore there has long been precedent for the commitment of American forces without any prior attack on the U.S. Also, there is very little extractable oil in Afghanistan.

Explanation / Answer

The correct answer for this case would be the argument provided by Option B. Among all the others, it offers sufficient reasoning that favours the official account, despite holding the idea that some parts of the theory may be unfalsifiable.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse S
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.