QUESTION 6 According to David Hume, how should a miracle be properly defined? O

Question

QUESTION 6 According to David Hume, how should a miracle be properly defined? O A violation of the laws of nature O An intervention by God O Something really wonderfu O An awe inspiring event QUESTION 7 Aristote believed that the soul was what? O A non-material thing that could not exist without a body O A material thing that was part of the body O A non material thing that could exist independent of a body O Non existent QUESTION 8 Two of the better known mind-body dualists are? O Berkeley and Locke O Socrates and Descartes O Hume and Locke O Berkeley and Hume QUE STION 9 According to Socrates, the soul is indestruotable because of what? It cannot be proven using reason @ It was created by Sod at the moment of our conception C It is too complex o it is simple and has no parts QUESTION 10 Hume saic that he hoced his aroumen: about miracles wouls be what? mi The fha argument to show mat mracies are ocssibe dithe fnal argument to prove the proper definiton of a miracle An everlasting check of supersttous de us on

Explanation / Answer

1. Hume defines miracles as a “ violation of the laws of nature”. This is further defined as “a transgression of a law of nature by a particular volition of the Deity” (p.173).

2. Aristotle defined that although soul is not a material thoing, it could not exist without a body.

Answer: option A: a non material thing that could not exist without a body.

3. B) Socrates and Descartes.

4. D) it is simple and has no parts

According to Socrates, the soul would never die and a human has both physical and a non physical part of body.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse Q
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.