When I was in the university (in the late 90s, circa 1995) I was told there had
ID: 1373298 • Letter: W
Question
When I was in the university (in the late 90s, circa 1995) I was told there had been research investigating the 2 (the square of distance) in the Newton's law of universal gravitation.
Maybe a model like
with a slightly different from 2, let say 1.999 or 2.001, fits some experimental data better?
Is that really true? Or did I misunderstand something?
When I was in the university (in the late 90s, circa 1995) I was told there had been research investigating the 2 (the square of distance) in the Newton's law of universal gravitation. F = Gm1m2/r^a with a slightly different from 2, let say 1.999 or 2.001, fits some experimental data better? Is that really true? Or did I misunderstand something? F = Gm1m2/r^2 Maybe a model likeExplanation / Answer
This was suggested by Asaph Hall in 1894, in an attempt to explain the anomalies in the orbit of Mercury. I retrieved the original article in http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1894AJ.....14...49H
Interestingly, he mentions in the introduction that Newton himself had already considered in the Principia what happens if the exponent is not exactly 2, and had concluded that the observations available to him strongly supported the exact power 2!
The story is retold, e.g., on p.356 of N.R. Hanson, Isis 53 (1962), 359-378.
See also Section 2 of http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/2005MNRAS.358.1273V
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.