A. It is not indigenous to the rainforest. B..Animals prefer the less sweet frui
ID: 163997 • Letter: A
Question
A. It is not indigenous to the rainforest.
B..Animals prefer the less sweet fruit as a food source.
C. Animals do not feed on the less sweet variety of fig.
D.Sweeter fruit enhances reproductive success in this species of fig.
A rainforest fig species has two varieties, which differ in the sweetness of their fruit. One variety has a very sweet fruit while the other produces a fruit that is not as sweet. A forest survey shows that the tree producing the sweet variety of fruit appears more frequently in the forest. What can you conclude about this species of fig tree?A. It is not indigenous to the rainforest.
B..Animals prefer the less sweet fruit as a food source.
C. Animals do not feed on the less sweet variety of fig.
D.Sweeter fruit enhances reproductive success in this species of fig.
Explanation / Answer
The given data claims that the frequency of sweet fruit producing tree in the forest is more as compared to its less sweet counterpart.
If it were not indigenous to the rainforest, the sweet variety would not have thrived wih such a high frequency in the rainforest in the first place. Therefore, the first option does not seem plausible.
The second option can be possible. If animals prefer the less sweet fruit, then the chances of seed dispersal can become low, or it can get dispersed at undesirable environements. This can limit the frequency of the trees.
The third option does not provide any relevant information.
The fourth option is also plausible. Superior genetic content of the sweet variety can improve reproductive success.
Therefore, from the above paragraph, the most plausible statements are statements 2 and 4.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.