Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

When due: Mar. 16th, 25 pts. Each student is to submit her or his own report. Yo

ID: 167730 • Letter: W

Question

When due: Mar. 16th, 25 pts. Each student is to submit her or his own report. You may share data and other results the group collected during lab However, you may not copy or answers to interpretive or conceptual questions in a lab pied answers receive zero points. Format: the report should have six sections. Each section should have a header, as follows: Cover Sheet v ntroduction Methods v Results Conclusions References Cover Sheet Include the following: The title of the report: "Amylase Activity Lab Report," or something similar. Your name. Course name and section number: Biology 10, section 7295 The date you are handing in the report. The number of your lab table, and the names the members of your lab team. please. Place a single staple in the upper-left hand corner of the report-no report covers Introduction Briefly state where and why you conducted the experiment. Formally state your initial hypothesis using the word "because." Your hypothesis should account of the test variables in this experimen Name all of the test variables, and make a for a prediction about how they think the experiment will turn out. Methods manual. Include enough information from Describe how the test tubes were set up. Cite your lab page 75 and 76, briefly explaining what was done, so that someone would know just by reading this report. This should be a "stand alone" report. Results: containing 76) Describe your experimental results, followed by a table your data (pg Conclusions think the Note whether your original hypothesis was supported by your data. Explain how you data support your hypothesis, or how they did not support your hypothesis. Develop a final

Explanation / Answer

The first question as you have written the answers already we will solve second question now!

2. According to the experiment our observation says that in all 5 test tubes there is a difference but to answer second question we want to consider only first two test tubes, here in first tube incubated at 37oC but without saliva and the observation after incubation is dark blue color/ black blue color appeared which says that the presence of Starch in tube one!!

Now when we observe second tube the conditions is same as in first tube but the presence of saliva in second tube. That is saliva is added after incubation at 37oC the observation of this experiment according to you its dark yellow and absence of starch but it should be colorless/ amber brown and absence of starch according to me, so finally absence of starch is the conclusion so that means the saliva which is the extra in the second tube which degraded the starch so it clearly says the saliva contain something that degrades the starch which is nothing but salivary amylase!!

And tube one and two are the direct evidence to this hypothesis, the only difference is the absence and presence of saliva in both test tubes respectively! As we know absence of saliva and presence of starch in first tube where as in second tube no Starch but had saliva

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote