\"medical ethics today\" proposal about ( communicating with children and young
ID: 168625 • Letter: #
Question
"medical ethics today"
proposal about ( communicating with children and young people to protact there health in health care ethics)
i chosed biology sciens because there is no health since in (select subject space)
****************
*******
The Basic Outline of a Paper
The following outline shows a basic format for most academic papers. No matter what length the paper needs to be, it should still follow the format of having an introduction, body, and conclusion. Read over what typically goes in each section of the paper. Use the back of this handout to outline information for your specific paper.
I. Introduction
The introduction should have some of the following elements, depending on the type of paper: Start with an attention grabber: a short story, example, statistic, or historical context that introduces the paper topic
Give an overview of any issues involved with the subject
Define of any key terminology need to understand the topic
Quote or paraphrase sources revealing the controversial nature of the subject (argumentative papers only)
Highlight background information on the topic needed to understand the direction of the paper
Write an antithesis paragraph, presenting the primary opposing views (argumentative paper only)
The introduction must end with a THESIS statement (a 1 to 2 sentences in length):
Tell what the overall paper will focus on Briefly outline the main points in the paper
II. Body
Clearly present the main points of the paper as listed in the thesis
Give strong examples, details, and explanations to support each main points
If an argumentative paper, address any counterarguments and refute those arguments
If a research paper, use strong evidence from sources—paraphrases, summaries, and quotations that support the main points
III. Conclusion
Restate your thesis from the introduction in different words
Briefly summarize each main point found in the body of the paper (avoid going over 2 sentences for each point)
Give a statement of the consequences of not embracing the position (argumentative paper only)
End with a strong clincher statement: an appropriate, meaningful final sentence that ties the whole point of the paper together (may refer back to the attention grabber)
Additional Tips
Decide on the thesis and main points first
You do not need to start writing your paper with the introduction
Try writing the thesis and body first; then go back and figure out how to best introduce the body and conclude the paper
Use transitions between main points and between examples within the main points
Always keep your thesis in the forefront of your mind while writing; everything in your paper must point back to the thesis
Use the back of this handout to make an outline of your paper
Paper Topic:____________________________________________________ Audience:__________
I. Introduction
Possible ideas for the introduction (see front side of handout for suggestions):
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
Thesis Statement (Usually the last sentence(s) in the introduction):
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
II. Body (A paper may have a few or many main points; decide how many your paper will need)
Main Point: ___________________________________________________________________ Examples/Details/Explanations:
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
Main Point: ___________________________________________________________________ Examples/Details/Explanations:
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
Main Point: ___________________________________________________________________ Examples/Details/Explanations:
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
Main Point: ___________________________________________________________________ Examples/Details/Explanations:
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
III. Conclusion
Reworded Thesis (Usually found near the beginning of the conclusion):
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ Other Ideas to Conclude:
________________________________
________________________________
Clincher Ideas: _________________________________________________________________
)
Explanation / Answer
Topic-"Case study of the relevance and significance of the effects and side-effects of drugs and vaccines on children".
Introduction--The case study deals with the research pacts and monetary investment involved along with compensation range for the development of vaccines and drugs by major pharmaceutical companies like Roche and Venter in partnership with each other for the share of the profit after marketing and the products use. The vaccines and drugs developed in the research labs of pharmaceutical companies after the organic synthesis for the cure of various diseases in children and adults in various age groups.The drug was developed for treatment of cancer of colon,lung and breast
Body--Theory- The case deals with the partnership pact between Roche and Venter with monitoring and distribution of the drugs and vaccines in south africa along with the side-effects and toxicity caused by over-dose of the drugs and vaccines in vials after prescribing them to children and adults by British pharmaceutical association and GVI company. The side-effects include--headache,pain,and lesions development in children. The investor of the company demanded compensation for the money invested for the development of drugs ad vaccines in these laboratories as they had major side-effects leading to toxicity and death.
Further the development of vaccines by Merck has proved hazardous due to the toxicity and death of patients after providing excess volumes of vaccines and drugs in vials which were directly given to patients resulted in over-dose in patients and children.
The argument between the two companies include the lack of construction of points and court agreement for the compensation of the side -effects of drugs before partnership leading to heavy losses after development of drugs and marketing of drugs and vaccines. Further the inaccuracy in deciding and finally declaring the range of money that can be wasted if the project fails to satify the market needs and demands.
The counterargument includes the poverty,poor health of children and adults,lack of awareness among infected people about the harmful effects of diseases, dose intake after serious spread of infection in children and people,lack of facilities, lack of medical-aid, heavy monetary fees charged by doctors, lack of knowledge,lack of prescription of drugs and vacciens from qualified doctors before the intake xof heavy doses of these products leading to toxicity and death and finally the statistical output blames the research laboratories of the reputed companies even after breakthrough and miraculous drug and vaccines development after many years of hardwork against death causing diseases caused by viruses and bacteria. The research and animal models for the experiments decide and monitor the dose concentration required for the cure of disease without side-effects.
CONCLUSION-- The partnership and investment policies of the two companies along with the third trial company was not concrete and was not decided properly before partnership due to which less compensation can be provided as mentioned many years but during the development but since then many years have passed and there has been an inflation in the prices of drugs, vaccines along with heavy service tax which has implemented later but not mentioned before during the implementation of monetary policies although small compensation points were considered ,along with patents and intellectual property rights and copyright for the development of the drug according to the year of development.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.