Question-2: Determine the design (maximum) tensile capacity N* for the connectio
ID: 1844936 • Letter: Q
Question
Question-2: Determine the design (maximum) tensile capacity N* for the connections shown below. All plates and steel profiles (i.e. PFCs and UBs) are Grade 300PLUS. The steel plates comply with AS/NZS3678 standard. Hint: Both connected members and plates must be checked. In case you require data involving steel grades and dimensions, please use this link to look up the data you need: http://infostore.saiglobal.com/store/Portal.aspx?publisher=AS (not clickable). Much appreciated.
20 are a 50 – Bolt M16 150PFC - 50 he —180 10 ( for the LOFFT, Bolt M16 200UB22.3 a 50 ce N* 10 : AF s—180 l 90 | Oo | Oo - 50 or 200UB22.3 - –200 mmH Cross-section Elevation view Top viewExplanation / Answer
• Gross section area = Ag = 5 x ½ = 2.5 in2
• Net section area (An)
- Bolt diameter = db = 7/8 in.
- Nominal hole diameter = dh = 7/8 + 1/16 in. = 15/16 in.
- Hole diameter for calculating net area = 15/16 + 1/16 in. = 1 in.
- Net section area = An = (5 – 2 x (1)) x ½ = 1.5 in2
• Gross yielding design strength = t Pn = t Fy Ag
- Gross yielding design strength = 0.9 x 50 ksi x 2.5 in2 = 112.5 kips
• Fracture design strength = t Pn = t Fu Ae
- Assume Ae = An (only for this problem)
- Fracture design strength = 0.75 x 65 ksi x 1.5 in2 = 73.125 kips
• Design strength of the member in tension = smaller of 73.125 kips and 112.5 kips
• Net section area = An
- Bolt diameter = 5/8 in.
- Nominal hole diameter = 5/8 + 1/16 = 11/16 in.
- Hole diameter for calculating net area = 11/16 + 1/16 = 3/4 in.
- Net section area = Ag – (3/4) x 3/8 = 2.86 – 3/4 x 3/8 = 2.579 in2
• Effective net area = Ae = 0.85 x 2.579 in2 = 2.192 in2
• Gross yielding design strength = t Ag Fy = 0.9 x 2.86 in2 x 36 ksi = 92.664 kips
• Net section fracture = t Ae Fu = 0.75 x 2.192 in2 x 58 ksi = 95.352 kips
8
CE 405: Design of Steel Structures – Prof. Dr. A. Varma Tension Member Design
• Design strength = 92.664 kips (gross yielding governs)
• Ultimate (design) load acting for the tension member = Pu
- The ultimate (design) load can be calculated using factored load combinations given on
page 2-11 of the AISC manual, or Equations (4.2-1 to 4.2-5) of notes (see pg. 4)
- According to these equations, two loading combinations are important for this problem.
These are: (1) 1.4 D; and (2) 1.2 D + 1.6 L
- The corresponding ultimate (design) loads are:
1.4 x (PD) = 1.4 (35) = 49 kips
1.2 (PD) + 1.6 (PL) = 66 kips (controls)
- The ultimate design load for the member is 66 kips, where the factored dead +
live loading condition controls.
• Compare the design strength with the ultimate design load
- The design strength of the member (92.664 kips) is greater than the ultimate design load
(66 kips).
- t Pn (92.664 kips) > Pu (66 kips)
• The L 4 x 4 x 3/8 in. made from A36 steel is adequate for carrying the factored loads.
• For ASTM A992 material: Fy = 50 ksi; and Fu = 65 ksi
• For the W8 x 24 section:
- Ag = 7.08 in2
- tw = 0.285 in.
- tf = 0.4 in.
• Gross yielding design strength = t Pn = t Ag Fy = 0.90 x 7.08 in2 x 50 ksi = 319 kips
• Net section fracture strength = t Pn = t Ae Fu = 0.75 x Ae x 65 ksi
- Ae = U An - for bolted connection
- An = Ag – (no. of holes) x (diameter of hole) x (thickness of flange)
An = 7.08 – 4 x (diameter of bolt + 1/8 in.) x 0.4 in.
An = 5.68 in2
d = 7.93 in.
bf = 6.5 in.
ry = 1.61 in.
3 in.
5 in.
5 in.
3 in. f d
3 in. 3 in. 3 in. 3 in. 3 in.
• The effective hole diameter is 1 + 1/8 = 1.125 in.
wn = 16.0 – 2 (1.125) = 13.75 in.
wn = 16.0 – 3 (1.125) + 2 x 32/ (4 x 5) = 13.52 in.
• The line a-b-c-d-e governs:
• An = t wn = 0.75 (13.52) = 10.14 in2
• Each fastener resists an equal share of the load
• Therefore different potential failure lines may be subjected to different loads.
• For example, line a-b-c-d-e must resist the full load, whereas i-j-f-h will be subjected to 8/11
of the applied load. The reason is that 3/11 of the load is transferred from the member
before i-j-f-h received any load.
• Step I. Select a section from the Tables
- Go to the TEN section of the AISC manual. See Table 3-1 on pages 3-17 to 3-19.
- From this table, select W8x10 with Ag = 2.96 in2, Ae = 2.22 in2.
- Gross yielding strength = 133 kips, and net section fracture strength=108 kips
- This is the lightest section in the table.
- Assumed U = 0.75. And, net section fracture will govern if Ae < 0.923 Ag
• Step II. Calculate the net section fracture strength for the actual connection
- According to the Figure above, An = Ag - 4 (db + 1/8) x tf
- An = 2.96 - 4 (3/4 + 1/8) x 0.205 = 2.24 in2
- The connection is only through the flanges. Therefore, the shear lag factor U will be the
distance from the top of the flange to the centroid of a WT 4 x 5.
31
CE 405: Design of Steel Structures – Prof. Dr. A. Varma Tension Member Design
- See DIM section of the AISC manual. See Table 1-8, on pages 1-50, 1-51
- x = 0.953
- U = 1- x /L = 1 - 0.953 / 4 = 0.76
- Ae = 0.76 An = 0.76 x 2.24 = 1.70 in2
- tPn = 0.75 x Fu x Ae = 0.75 x 65 x 1.70 = 82.9 kips
- Unacceptable because Pu = 100 kips; REDESIGN required
• Step III. Redesign
Many ways to redesign. One way is shown here:
- Assume t Pn > 100 kips
- Therefore, 0.75 x 65 x Ae > 100 kips
- Therefore, Ae > 2.051 in2
- Assume, Ae = 0.76 An (based on previous calculations, step II)
- Therefore An > 2.7 in2
- But, Ag = An + 4 (db + 1/8) x tf (based on previous calculations, step II)
- Therefore Ag > 2.7 + 3.5 x tf
- Go to the section dimension table 1-1 on page 1-22 of the AISC manual. Select next
highest section.
For W 8 x 13, tf = 0.255 in.
Therefore, Ag > 2.7 + 3.5 x 0.255 = 3.59 in2
From Table 1-1, W8 x 13 has Ag = 3.84 in2 > 3.59 in2
Therefore, W8 x 13 is acceptable and is chosen.
32
CE 405: Design of Steel Structures – Prof. Dr. A. Varma Tension Member Design
• Step IV. Check selected section for net section fracture
- Ag = 3.84 in2
- An = 3.84 - 3.5 x 0.255 = 2.95 in2
- From dimensions of WT4 x 6.5, x = 1.03 in.
- Therefore, U = 1- x /L = 1-1.03/4 = 0.74
- Therefore, Ae = U An = 0.74 x 2.95 = 2.19 in2
- Therefore, net section fracture strength = 0.75 x 65 x 2.19 = 106.7 kips
- Which is greater than 100 kips (design load). Therefore, W 8 x 13 is acceptable.
• Step V. Check the block shear rupture strength
o Identify the block shear path
4
in.
2 in.
1.5 in.
1.5 in.
2 in. 4 in.
- The block shear path is show above. Four blocks will separate from the tension
member (two from each flange) as shown in the figure above.
- Agv = [(4+2) x tf ] x 4 = 6 x 0.255 x 4 = 6.12 in2 - for four tabs
- Anv = {4+2 - 1.5 x (db+1/8)} x tf x 4 = 4.78 in2
- Agt = 1.5 x tf x 4 = 1.53 in2
- Ant = {1.5 - 0.5 x (db+1/8)}x tf x 4 = 1.084 in2
o Identify the governing equation:
33
CE 405: Design of Steel Structures – Prof. Dr. A. Varma Tension Member Design
- FuAnt = 65 x 1.084 = 70.4 kips
- 0.6FuAnv = 0.6 x 65 x 4.78 = 186.42 kips , which is > FuAnt
o Calculate block shear strength
- tRn = 0.75 (0.6FuAnv + FyAgt) = 0.75 (186.42 + 50 x 1.53) = 197.2 kips
- Which is greater than Pu = 100 kips. Therefore W8 x 13 is still acceptable
• Summary of solution
Mem. Design Ag An U Ae Yield Fracture Block-shear
load strength strength strength
W8x13 100 kips 3.84 2.95 0.74 2.19 173 kips 106.7 kips 197.2 kips
Design strength = 106.7 kips (net section fracture governs)
W8 x 13 is adequate for Pu = 100 kips and the given connection
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.