Case 21: Late ConfessionIn 1968, Norm Lewis was a 51 – year old doctoral candida

Question

Case 21: Late ConfessionIn 1968, Norm Lewis was a 51 – year old doctoral candidate in history at the University of Washington. While taking his final exam in the program, he excused himself to go to the bathroom, where he looked at his notes. For the next 32 years, Lewis told no one. At age 83, he decided to confess, and he wrote to the president of the university admitting that he had cheated and that he had regretted it ever since.Commenting on the case, Jeanne Wilson, president of the Center for Academic Integrity remarked, “I think there is an important lesson here for students about the costs of cheating. He has felt guilty all these years, and felt burdened by this secret, believing that he never really earned the degree he was awarded.” Wilson’s position is that the University of Washington should not take action against Lewis, given his confession, his age, and the fact that, after all, he did complete his coursework and dissertation.But, she added, “On the other hand, I think an institution might feel compelled to revoke the degree if we were talking about a medical or law degree or license, or some other professional field such as engineering or education, and the individual were younger and still employed on the basis of that degree or license.Discuss the ethical issues this case raises, both for Dr. Lewis and for University of Washington officials. Evaluate Jeanne Wilson’s analysis, especially as it might apply to engineers.

Review the case study 21: “Late confession” from the textbook and discuss the ethical issues involved in this case and explain how you would analyze the case? (use the template: Evaluating the Case Study).

Explanation / Answer

Ethical Issue Related to this CASE:

Cheating is an foul style of untrustiness in light of the actual fact that one looks to misdirect additionally on exploit the people who don't seem to be swindling. it is a two-fer: an infringement of each trust and reasonableness. Not all untruths are unscrupulous, despite the actual fact that every one falsehoods are untrusty. Huh? Truth is unknown than fiction, trait isn't an untouched guideline.

Once in a while, dishonesty is virtuously affordable, as once the police lie covert operations or when one misleads crooks or terrorists to spare lives. Be that because it might, do not kid yourself: events for morally endorsed lying are uncommon would like} filling a high need truly, for instance, sparing an existence — not striking an administration satisfying deals target or winning an amusement or keeping away from a gathering. a major timeframe in an engineering setting amid their college years, giving us a one of a form probability to focus on the association between scholarly untrustiness and professional conduct.

In the event that tricking may be a wise and frequently fruitful procedure, then ethical and viable modification should return at the level of setting: we've to rethink the schoolroom as a association within which deceiving is certainly not simply morally, however, deliberately undesirable. what is additional, we've to try and do this whereas cross examining As hostile embrace the philosophical theory of evaluations.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse C
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.