Eliot Rey, the owner of a publicly held technology company, asked Mary Messup, C

Question

Eliot Rey, the owner of a publicly held technology company, asked Mary Messup, CPA, to conduct an audit of the company's records. The financial statements to be audited covered a two-year period. The statements needed to be ready to submit to the SEC by September 30, 2017. Rey also needed to provide the audited financial statements to their bank as part of a large loan application. Messup immediately accepted the engagement and agreed to provide an auditor's report within one month. Rey agreed to pay Messup her normal audit fee plus a percentage of the loan if it was approved Messup hired two Sac State accounting graduates (both graduated in May 2017) to conduct the audit. She spent several hours going over what they needed to do. She told the new hires not to spend any time reviewing the client's system of internal control but to concentrate on checking the mathematical accuracy of the general ledger and summarizing the data in the accounting records that supported Rey's financial statements. The new hires followed Messup' instructions. They competed the audit procedures in two days. They did notice that the company failed to include the terms of a large note payable in the footnotes, but they were nervous about talking to Mr. Rey about that. They did talk to Mr. Rey about the fact that although 25% of the accounts receivable were over 120 days old there was no allowance for doubtful accounts included. Mr. Rey said they shouldn't be concerned about that. They made a note of his response in the workpapers. They turned over the workpapers to Messup along with the financial statements prepared by the client. Messup gave an unmodified (clean) opinion on the financials. REQUIRED: For each of the auditing principles listed, identify the action(s) taken (or not taken) by Messup or her assistants that support(s) their compliance with the requirement.

Explanation / Answer

In the given case, the auditor did not use professional judgement instead she clearly depended on the workpapers presented to her by the accounting graduates. She should atleast go through the details and she should definitely audit the internal controls to know the discrepencies which may be included in the innate procedures in the company.

Its a general practice to an auditor to maintain professional skepticism. In the event of non disclosure of large note payable, the auditor would be suspicious and she should go indepth of the discrepencies but instead giving a clean or unmodified opinion clearly states the negligence the auditor paid towards the audit and it definitely attempts to a professional misconduct by the auditor.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse E
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.