How would you reply to your coworker? Consider the following items in your discu

Question

How would you reply to your coworker? Consider the following items in your discussion:
1.Do the tools help only in certain situations such as routine, daily or rather mundane decisions, like cost controls, quality controls or staffing questions (in term of number of people needed)?
2.How can analysis tools help the finance or accounting arms of a company more so than operations managers? (For example, do computers really think? Do they learn from their mistakes? Can they manipulate or change their environment?)
3.What happens if the data entered is wrong?
4.Respond to another students’

Explanation / Answer

I do not concur with the statement of my coworker. Selecting an adequate analysis tool is just one aspect within the greater framework. Utilizing the tool efficiently and understanding how to employ the outcome(s) is equally important. An appropriate analysis tool will not be advantageous for the inexperienced manager if s/he does not possess the capacity to appropriately understand and employ the results of the analysis. Having proper data and a good construal of the results are both requirements to make the best use of such a tool (Tague, 2005). Without these elements, the tool is considered inadequate. As such, excellent tools can certainly make a fine manager become even finer or conversely, it can make a bad manager even worse. For example, a good manager can distinguish if the output of a tool is based on either good or bad data, whereas an inexperienced manager does not have the capacity to recognize the difference. Analysis systems can unquestionably be a useful tool for even an inexperienced manager as long as s/he feels contented asking a more practiced and skilled manager if his/her conclusion is correct according to the analysis system’s output. The more critical and tactical the decisions are - the more one would desire an experienced manager to utilize the system's output, in addition to his/her knowledge and perception. Analysis tools can be utilized in numerous environments. An inexperienced manager does not have the capability to completely utilize the analysis tools based on his/her perception and skill with the application of tools. The output that is received by the tool’s utilization can be obliging for numerous departments within the organization; not just restricted to a particular unit (Tague, 2005). In addition, the data utilized in analysis tools can ultimately be erroneous, which would not be effortlessly comprehended by inexperienced managers. This, in turn, could potentially cause unsuccessful actions (Wilson, 1993). An experienced manager, however, has a higher probability of finding such faults within the output. Even though both technologies are constantly evolving, they will never have the capacity to fully substitute experience; it is the understanding, capability, and ingenuity of experienced managers that can totally utilize the analytical reports based on the output these tools. A solid analytical tool is ineffectual if there is not a person within the organization that has the capacity to fully investigate and analyze the output that is generated from the tools. A great example of GIGO is an MRP system that assists buyers in determining their purchases. An MRP system helps ensure both a precise inventory and lead times from contractors. If the system says there are products on hand when in fact there are none, it will ultimately not succeed in alerting the buyer to create an order. If the system thinks the lead time for replenishing the product is three weeks, it will notify the buyer to purchase the product three weeks before it is needed. This is the reason why such systems are valueless without experienced buyers utilizing and analyzing their output on a regular basis. All in all, such tools cannot be a substitute for experienced managers. Computers do not inevitably have the capacity to think; they can only present answers to detailed questions that do not call for further analysis. Computers are merely tools, and do not have the capacity to be trained from their error(s). People, however, have the ability learn from the erroneous data that a computer supplies and manipulate the program as needed. Computers attempt to analyze the data that is provided by people and have the ability to inspect multifaceted problems which are too intricate to be solved by people (Tague, 2005). However, these answer need to be evaluated appropriately and in a precise way; this can only be effectively done by a person. Therefore, computers process tasks based on how they were programmed; however, they are incapable of completing anything outside of their programming. Computers are limited in their abilities. Computers are not able to learn from their errors and they are unable to alter their environment. As such, only people can put these computers to their greatest use.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse H
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.