In Silent Spring , Rachel Carson uses a very powerful narrative framework to des
ID: 237619 • Letter: I
Question
In Silent Spring, Rachel Carson uses a very powerful narrative framework to describe the world as it exists in harmony and bliss before the fall into the massive use of poisons in the environment. In 1,000-1,250-words, summarize the key issues addressed in this publication; discuss how this publication has contributed to current knowledge and understanding of the dynamic between the environment and health; and explain the relationship between the environment and health.
Refer to the assigned readings to incorporate specific examples and details into your paper. You are required to use a minimum of three additional references in your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
Read chapters 1 and 4 of the text book, Essentials of Environmental Health. Here is the grading rubric
Environmental Health From a Historical Perspective Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
15.0 %Introduction
Introduction is either not present or not evident to the reader.
Introduction is insufficiently developed and/or vague. Purpose is not clear, and paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Introduction is present but lacks clarity and/or depth.
Introduction is clear, forecasting development of paper.
Introduction is comprehensive; reader knows exactly what to expect. Provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points.
30.0 %Explains the relationship between the environment and health.
Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. Fails to formulate and clearly express own point of view.
Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions. Formulates a vague and indecisive point of view.
Surface level of evaluation of the content is offered. Expresses a preference in personal point of view.
Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria. Formulates a clear and precise personal point of view.
Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates the relationship between the environment and health. Draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions. Not only formulates a clear and precise personal point of view, but also acknowledges objections and rival positions.
10.0 %Evidence (examples)
No examples were used to support the assignment.
Few examples were used to support the assignment. Limited evidence is apparent.
Evidence (examples) is adequate and standard in relevance and/or quality.
Evidence (examples) is relevant and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Evidence (examples) is supportive of the rationale presented. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
15.0 %Conclusion
Conclusion is either not present or not evident to the reader.
Conclusion is insufficiently developed and/or vague and lacks any discernible purpose.
Conclusion is present, but statements lack depth of understanding.
Conclusion is clear and identifies key ideas regarding the relationship between the environment and health.
Conclusion is comprehensive and paints a clear picture of the relationship between the environment and health.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
15.0 %Introduction
Introduction is either not present or not evident to the reader.
Introduction is insufficiently developed and/or vague. Purpose is not clear, and paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Introduction is present but lacks clarity and/or depth.
Introduction is clear, forecasting development of paper.
Introduction is comprehensive; reader knows exactly what to expect. Provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points.
30.0 %Explains the relationship between the environment and health.
Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. Fails to formulate and clearly express own point of view.
Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions. Formulates a vague and indecisive point of view.
Surface level of evaluation of the content is offered. Expresses a preference in personal point of view.
Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria. Formulates a clear and precise personal point of view.
Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates the relationship between the environment and health. Draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions. Not only formulates a clear and precise personal point of view, but also acknowledges objections and rival positions.
10.0 %Evidence (examples)
No examples were used to support the assignment.
Few examples were used to support the assignment. Limited evidence is apparent.
Evidence (examples) is adequate and standard in relevance and/or quality.
Evidence (examples) is relevant and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Evidence (examples) is supportive of the rationale presented. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
15.0 %Conclusion
Conclusion is either not present or not evident to the reader.
Conclusion is insufficiently developed and/or vague and lacks any discernible purpose.
Conclusion is present, but statements lack depth of understanding.
Conclusion is clear and identifies key ideas regarding the relationship between the environment and health.
Conclusion is comprehensive and paints a clear picture of the relationship between the environment and health.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage
Explanation / Answer
Though they will perhaps continuously be fewer famous than conflicts, hikes, uprisings, or stormy party-political movements, records have at eras been the greatest influential influencer of communal alteration in American lifetime. Thomas Paine's Common Intelligence spurred fundamental sentimentality in the early existences of the Rebellion; Uncle Tom's Cottage by Harriet Beecher Stowe stirred the North's opposition to captivity in the decade foremost up to the Civil Conflict; and Rachel Carson's Silent Coil, which in 1962 unprotected the dangers of the insecticide DDT, expressively interrogated humanity's confidence in technical advancement and assisted set the phase for the ecological drive.
DDT, the greatest powerful insecticide the world had ever recognized, unprotected countryside's defenselessness. Different most insecticides, whose efficiency is incomplete to abolishing one or two types of bugs, DDT was accomplished of murder hundreds of dissimilar types at once. Industrialized in 1939, it first illustrious himself throughout World War II, payment South Pacific isles of malaria producing bugs for U.S. crowds while existence used as an real delousing precipitate in Europe. Its discoverer was presented the Nobel Prize.
Silent Spring took Carson around four years to complete. It accurately labeled how DDT arrived the food chain and amassed in the fatty materials of faunae, counting human beings, and instigated cancer and genetic injury. A solitary request on a crop, she inscribed, slayed bugs for weeks and months not only the beleaguered insects but countless added and sustained poisonous in the setting smooth after it was feeble by rain. Carson obvious that DDT and extra insecticides had irreversibly hurt faunae and had contaminated the world's food foundation.
Her cautious groundwork, though, had remunerated off. Forestalling the response of the biochemical manufacturing, she had accumulated Silent Spring as one would a lawyer's short-lived, with no less than 55 sheets of minutes and a gradient of specialists who had recite and accepted the document. Many well-known scientists design to her protection, and when Leader John F. Kennedy well-ordered the President's Science Advisory Group to inspect the subjects the book elevated, its account methodically justified both Silent Spring and its author. As a result, DDT came under much closer government supervision and was eventually banned. The public debate moved quickly from whether pesticides were dangerous to which ones were dangerous, and the burden of proof shifted from the opponents of unrestrained pesticide use to the manufacturers.
The most important legacy of Silent Spring, though, was a new public awareness that nature was vulnerable to human intervention. Carson had made a radical proposal: that, at times, technological progress is so fundamentally at odds with natural processes that it must be curtailed. Conservation had never raised much broad public interest, for few people really worried about the disappearance of wilderness. But the threats Carson had outlined the adulteration of the food cable, cancer, genetic damage, and the deaths of complete species were too terrifying to disregard. For the primary time, the need to control industry in instruction to defend the setting developed extensively putative, and conservationism was born.
Sprays, powders and aerosols are now practical nearly usually to farmhouses, parks, woods and families non-selective materials that have the control to slay each insect, the decent and the bad, to still the melody of the natures and the jumping of fish in the streams, to coat the greeneries with a deadly film and to linger on in the soil all this however the envisioned board may be only a insufficient weeds or bugs, she inscribed. One or two writers had beforehand optional contemporary pesticides posed hazards. None inscribed with the expressiveness of Carson.
We have abundant to acknowledge Carson for: an influential green drive, a consciousness that we cannot chastise our environment extensively and a sympathetic of the brittleness of nature's food cable. But is the setting in healthier shape nowadays? Have we protected the earth? Or is it in better danger than always? Fifty years afterward Silent Spring was available, as the biosphere take to, sea heights increase and coral ridges smash, these queries have learnt a novel and urgent significance.
Rachel Carson controlled an infrequent mixture of handouts. She was a vivid marine environmentalist and an excellent author whose style was beautiful in its exactness and lyricism. In 1952, she gained a US Nationwide Book prize for The Sea around Us. Yet her greatest well-known effort, Silent Spring, is astonishingly problematic to get finished. "It is thick and practical and not a volume for the seashore," says birdwatcher Connor Mark Jameson, writer of Silent Spring Reentered, a re-examination of Carson's inheritance. By present values of discipline inscription, it is uncooperative material.
It was a courageous exertion. Even genuine censure of administration rule was a dangerous act in the US then. Discipline and knowledge and those who functioned in these arenas were respected as the saviors of the free biosphere and the executors of wealth, speaks additional writer, Linda Lear. In Silent Coil, Rachel Carson disclosures these specialists to community inspection and brands it strong that at finest they had not completed their schoolwork and at nastiest they had suspended the fact.
From this viewpoint, the book is not just an environmental alarm noise. It is an attack on the authoritarianism of postwar discipline, nevertheless to be fair to its doctors, many providing contextual material and checks of Carson's documents in expectation of the predictable energetic reply of US industry.
And America's biochemical hulks did not dissatisfy. They strained to prosecute her, the New Yorker and her producer, Houghton Mifflin. When this method unsuccessful, they hurled a $250,000 promotional movement to bosh Carson and her discipline. She was ridiculed for existence panic-stricken and instinctive and for existence a spinster woman. She was an exaggerated, they demanded. She reserved cats and treasured birds. Even a previous US administrator of cultivation was recognized to miracle in community why a single with no offspring was so absorbed in heredities. Her indefensible crime was that she had surpassed her residence as a female.
Carson's adversaries have long reminiscences, though. Websites, numerous recognized by conservative organizations sponsored by US manufacturing, entitlement that she was a form assassin who slew more persons than the Nazis, for instance. The DDT ban was accountable, these places claim, for the demises of innumerable Africans from malaria that would have remained measured had the west not stationary manufacture the insecticide. The entitlements are disallowed by science historians. DDT was barred not just since it was accruing in the food cable but since mosquitoes were emerging confrontation to it, they state. However, collections still guilt Carson for the present disease of malaria.
In detail, Carson's notices are still extremely pertinent, both in footings of the exact danger modeled by DDT and its fellow substances and to the over-all environmental hazards facing humankind. The oceans are now watching the land dismays she labeled in Silent Spring. The seas are the final basins. Chemicals get eroded out of the earth and into watercourses and rivers. They must relax on the sea cradle and sojourn there. Though, fishing has develop so penetrating, with ships searching up edgings and bottom-dwelling fish all the period, that we are continually tilling up these poisons, counting DDT, and rousing them hind into the aquatic.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.