Ethics and quality. Wainwright Corporation manufactures auto parts for two leadi
ID: 2427483 • Letter: E
Question
Ethics and quality. Wainwright Corporation manufactures auto parts for two leading Japanese automakers. Nancy Evans is the management accountant for one of Wainwright’s largest manufacturing plants. The plant’s General Manager, Chris Sheldon, has just returned from a meeting at corporate headquarters where quality expectations were outlined for 2012. Chris calls Nancy into his office to relay the corporate quality objective that total quality costs will not exceed 10% of total revenues by plant under any circumstances. Chris asks Nancy to provide him with a list of options for meeting corporate headquarter’s quality objective. The plant’s initial budgeted revenues and quality costs for 2012 are as follows:
Revenue……………………………………………3,400,000
Quality Costs:
Testing of purchased materials…………………….….32,000
Quality control training for production staff…….…….5,000
Warranty repairs………………………………….…...82,000
Quality design engineering……………………….…...48,000
Customer support……………………………….…….37,000
Materials scrap…………………………………….….12,000
Product inspection…………………………………..102,000
Engineering redesign of failed parts………….……....21,000
Rework of failed parts………………………………..18,000
Prior to receiving the new corporate quality objective, Nancy had collected information for all of the plant’s possible options for improving both product quality and costs of quality. She was planning to introduce the idea of reengineering the manufacturing process at a one-time cost of $75,000, which would decrease product inspection costs by approximately 25% per year and was expected to reduce warranty repairs and customer support by an estimated 40% per year. After seeing the new corporate objective, Nancy is reconsidering the reengineering idea. Nancy returns to her office and crunches the numbers again to look for other alternatives. She concludes that by increasing the cost of quality control training for production staff by $15,000 per year, the company would reduce inspection costs by 10% annually and reduce warranty repairs and customer support costs by 20% per year, as well. She is leaning toward only presenting this latter option to Chris, the general manager, since this is the only option that meets the new corporate quality objective.
1- Calculate the ratio of each costs-of-quality category (prevention, appraisal, internet failure, and external failure) to revenues for 2012. Are the total costs of quality as a percentage of revenues currently less than 10%?
2- Which of the two quality options should Nancy propose to the general manager, Chris Sheldon? Show the two year outcome for each option: (a) reengineer the manufacturing process for $75,000 and (b) increase quality training expenditure by $15,000 per year.
3- Suppose Nancy decides not to present the reengineering option to Chris. Is Nancy’s action unethical? Explain.
Explanation / Answer
Wainwright corporation Current Situation Reingineering Option Quality Training Option Details Revenue/Cost $ % of Revenue Revenue/Cost $ % of Revenue Revenue/Cost $ % of Revenue Revenue 3,400,000 3,400,000 3,400,000 Quality Costs Testing of purchased material 32,000 0.94% 32,000 0.94% 32,000 0.94% Quality control training for production staff 5,000 0.15% 5,000 0.15% 20,000 0.59% Warranty repairs 82,000 2.41% 49,200 1.45% 65,600 1.93% Quality design engineering 48,000 1.41% 48,000 1.41% 48,000 1.41% Customer support 37,000 1.09% 22,200 0.65% 29,600 0.87% Materials scrap 12,000 0.35% 12,000 0.35% 12,000 0.35% Production inspection 102,000 3.00% 76,500 2.25% 91,800 2.70% Engineering redesign of failed parts 21,000 0.62% 21,000 0.62% 21,000 0.62% Rework of failed parts 18,000 0.53% 18,000 0.53% 18,000 0.53% Reengineering manufacturing process - 0.00% 75,000 2.21% - 0.00% Total Quality cost 357,000 10.50% 358,900 10.56% 338,000 9.94% 1 Current cost of quality is above the corporate limit set. 2 As the quality training option is meeting the corporate qulaity objective , it must be presented to Chris, but the reengineering option also can be presented as except the one time cost, it has a good future potential 3 As a Management Accountant it would be unethical for Nancy not to present the reengineering option. As a matter of fact she should present all the options availabe , and the reengineering is a good option if we consider the one time cost and take the long term benefits into account, it turns out to be a good proposition in the long term.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.