QUESTION 1 The key question answered by incremental analysis is: Is the IRR earn
ID: 2484031 • Letter: Q
Question
QUESTION 1
The key question answered by incremental analysis is:
Is the IRR earned on the additional cost > MARR?
Which alternative has the highest IRR?
Does the lowest cost alternative have an IRR > MARR?
Does each alternative have an IRR > MARR?
1 points
QUESTION 2
When considering 3 or more mutually exclusive alternatives, how should the alternatives be ranked before performing incremental analysis?
From lowest initial cost to highest initial cost
From highest initial cost to lowest initial cost
From highest EUAC to lowest EUAC
From lowest EUAC to highest EUAC
1 points
QUESTION 3
Based on the table, what is the EUAC for Investment A when i = 15%?
$2541
$3785
$3896
$5436
1 points
QUESTION 4
Based on the table, what is the EUAC for Investment B when i = 15%?
$2541
$3785
$3896
$5436
1 points
QUESTION 5
Based on the table, what is the incremental initial cost in moving from Investment A to Investment B when i = 15%?
$172
$600
$1300
$3000
1 points
QUESTION 6
Based on the table, what is the incremental EUAC in moving from Investment A to Investment B when i = 15%?
Reduced EUAC of $111
Additional EUAC of $111
Additional EUAC of $600
Reduced EUAC of $600
1 points
QUESTION 7
Based on the table showing 3 mutually exclusive alternatives X, Y, and Z, which is the correct order for performing incremental analysis?
Compare X against “Do nothing” then the preferred against Y then the preferred against Z
Compare Y against “Do nothing” then the preferred against X then the preferred against Z
Compare Z against “Do nothing” then the preferred against X then the preferred against Y
Choose the alternative with the highest IRR assuming IRR > MARR
1 points
QUESTION 8
Based on the table and assuming MARR = 18%, is Investment Z economically feasible?
Yes, because NPW>0 when i = 18%
Yes, because NPW<0 when i = 18%
No, because NPW>0 when i = 18%
No, because NPW<0 when i = 18%
1 points
QUESTION 9
Based on the table and assuming MARR = 18%, is Investment X preferred to Investment Z when compared incrementally?
Yes, because incremental PWb > incremental PWc when i = 18%
Yes, because incremental PWb < incremental PWc when i = 18%
No, because incremental PWb > incremental PWc when i = 18%
No, because incremental PWb < incremental PWc when i = 18%
1 points
QUESTION 10
Based on the table and assuming MARR = 18%, which alternative is preferred based on incremental analysis?
The “Do Nothing” Alternative
Alternative X
Alternative Y
Alternative Z
1 points
QUESTION 11
You can invest $100,000 in Facility 1 and earn $32,000 profit per year for 5 years or invest $150,000 in Facility 2 and earn $48,000 profit per year for 5 years. If your MARR = 15%:
Only Facility 1 is a feasible alternative
Only Facility 2 is a feasible alternative
Both Facility 1 and Facility 2 are feasible alternatives
Neither Facility 1 nor Facility 2 is a feasible alternative
1 points
QUESTION 12
You can invest $100,000 in Facility 1 and earn $32,000 profit per year for 5 years or invest $150,000 in Facility 2 and earn $48,000 profit per year for 5 years. If your MARR = 15%:
Facility 1 is preferred based on incremental analysis
Facility 2 is preferred based on incremental analysis
Both Facility 1 and Facility 2 are equally preferred based on incremental analysis
Neither Facility 1 nor Facility 2 is feasible so the "Do Nothing" alternative is preferred
a.Is the IRR earned on the additional cost > MARR?
b.Which alternative has the highest IRR?
c.Does the lowest cost alternative have an IRR > MARR?
d.Does each alternative have an IRR > MARR?
Explanation / Answer
Question 1 )
incremental Analysis is used to make decisions by selecting between at least two alternatives. So the answer is (b) which alternative has highest IRR
question 8))
Based on the table and assuming MARR = 18%, is Investment Z economically feasible?
a.
Yes, because NPW>0 when i = 18% answer is (a)
Question 12 )
If the investment is $100,000 and MARR is 15%
Revenue is $32000 for year PV is 32000 x 3.3522 = $107270
The present worth = 107270 – 100000 = $7270
If the investment is $150000 and MARR is 15%
Revenue is $48000 for year PV is 32000 x 3.3522 = $160905
The present worth = 160905 – 150000 = $10905
The incremental benefit in project b is = 10905 – 7270 = 3635 hence answer is (b ) facility B is preferred
a.
Yes, because NPW>0 when i = 18% answer is (a)
Question 12 )
If the investment is $100,000 and MARR is 15%
Revenue is $32000 for year PV is 32000 x 3.3522 = $107270
The present worth = 107270 – 100000 = $7270
If the investment is $150000 and MARR is 15%
Revenue is $48000 for year PV is 32000 x 3.3522 = $160905
The present worth = 160905 – 150000 = $10905
The incremental benefit in project b is = 10905 – 7270 = 3635 hence answer is (b ) facility B is preferred
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.