Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Corbett Pharmaceuticals manufacturers an? over-the-counter allergy medication. T

ID: 2518181 • Letter: C

Question

Corbett Pharmaceuticals manufacturers an? over-the-counter allergy medication. The company sells both large commercial containers of? 1,000 capsules to health care facilities and travel packs of 20 capsules to shops in? airports, train? stations, and hotels. The following information has been developed to determine if an? activity-based costing system would be? beneficial:

Estimated

Estimated Quantity

Activity

Indirect Costs

Allocation Base

of Allocation Base

Materials handling

$96,000

Number of kilos

24,000

kilos

Packaging

210,000

Number of machine hours

3,000

hours

Quality assurance

114,000

Number of samples

1,900

samples

Total indirect costs

$420,000

Actual production information includes the? following:

Commercial Containers

Travel Packs

Units produced

3,200

containers

51,000

packs

Weight in kilos

12,800

5,100

Machine hours

2,400

510

Number of samples

640

765

CorberttCorbertt?'s

original single plantwide overhead allocation rate costing system allocated indirect costs to products at

$ 140.00$140.00

per machine hour. Compute the total indirect costs allocated to the commercial containers and to the travel packs under the original system. Then compute the indirect cost per unit for each product. Round to two decimal places.

2.

Compute the predetermined overhead allocation rate for each activity.

3.

Use the predetermined overhead allocation rates to compute the? activity-based costs per unit of the commercial containers and the travel packs. Round to two decimal places.

?(?Hint:

First compute the total? activity-based costs allocated to each product? line, and then compute the cost per? unit.)

4.

Compare the indirect? activity-based costs per unit to the indirect costs per unit from the traditional system. How have the unit costs? changed? Explain why the costs changed.

Corbertt original single plantwide overhead allocation rate costing system allocated indirect costs to products at $ 140.00 per machine hour. Compute the total indirect costs allocated to the commercial containers and to the travel packs under the original system. Then compute the indirect cost per unit for each product. Round to two decimal places.

Estimated

Estimated Quantity

Activity

Indirect Costs

Allocation Base

of Allocation Base

Materials handling

$96,000

Number of kilos

24,000

kilos

Packaging

210,000

Number of machine hours

3,000

hours

Quality assurance

114,000

Number of samples

1,900

samples

Total indirect costs

$420,000

Explanation / Answer

1) Indirect costs allocated to common containers and travel packs on plant wide rate

2) Predetermined overhead allocated rate for each activity

3) Indirect cost per unit using the activity based costing

4) We see that the indirect costs per unit allocated to Commercial containers has reduced by $24.5 and has increased for Travel packs by $0.6. This is because under the traditional costing system, the cost was alllocated purely on the basis of machine hours which is muc higher for commercial contrainers as compared to travel packs. As a result higher costs were allocated. However, the under the ABC costing system, the costs are allocated on the basis of activities used for various components which comrpsie the indirect costs. Hence, the per unit cost has reduced for commercial containers.

Commerical Containers Travel packs Machine Hours 2400 510 Allocation rate $140 $140 Overheads allocated $3,36,000 $71,400 No. of units $3,200 $51,000 Per unit indirect cost $105.00 $1.40
Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote