Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

4-26 D’Leon Inc., Part II Financial Statement Analysis Part I of this case, pres

ID: 2615995 • Letter: 4

Question

4-26

D’Leon Inc., Part II

Financial Statement Analysis

Part I of this case, presented in Chapter 3, discussed the situation that D’Leon Inc., a regional snack-foods producer, was in after an expansion program. D’Leon had increased plant capacity and undertaken a major marketing campaign in an attempt to “go national.” Thus far, sales have not been up to the forecasted level, costs have been higher than were projected, and a large loss occurred in 2005 rather than the expected profit. As a result, its managers, directors, and investors are concerned about the firm’s survival.

Donna Jamison was brought in as assistant to Fred Campo, D’Leon’s chairman, who had the task of getting the company back into a sound financial position. D’Leon’s 2004 and 2005 balance sheets and income statements, together with projections for 2006, are given in Tables IC 4-1 and IC 4-2. In addition, Table IC 4-3 gives the company’s 2004 and 2005 financial ratios, together with industry average data. The 2006 projected financial statement data represent Jamison’s and Campo’s best guess for 2006 results, assuming that some new financing is arranged to get the company “over the hump.”

Jamison examined monthly data for 2005 (not given in the case), and she detected an improving pattern during the year. Monthly sales were rising, costs were falling, and large losses in the early months had turned to a small profit by December. Thus, the annual data look somewhat worse than final monthly data. Also, it appears to be taking longer for the advertising program to get the message across, for the new sales offices to generate sales, and for the new manufacturing facilities to operate efficiently. In other words, the lags between spending money and deriving benefits were longer than D’Leon’s managers had anticipated. For these reasons, Jamison and Campo see hope for the company—provided it can survive in the short run.

Jamison must prepare an analysis of where the company is now, what it must do to regain its financial health, and what actions should be taken. Your assignment is to help her answer the following questions. Provide clear explanations, not yes or no answers.

Table IC 4-1. Balance Sheets

                                                               2006E               2005                2004     

Assets

Cash                                                   $     85,632      $       7,282      $     57,600

Accounts receivable                                878,000           632,160           351,200

Inventories                                        1,716,480      1,287,360        715,200

     Total current assets                       $ 2,680,112      $ 1,926,802      $ 1,124,000

Gross fixed assets                              1,197,160      1,202,950           491,000

Less accumulated depreciation             380,120         263,160      146,200

     Net fixed assets                             $   817,040      $   939,790      $   344,800

Total assets                                        $ 3,497,152      $ 2,866,592      $ 1,468,800

Liabilities and Equity

Accounts payable                               $   436,800      $   524,160      $   145,600

Notes payable                                         300,000           636,808           200,000

Accruals                                             408,000         489,600         136,000

     Total current liabilities                  $ 1,144,800      $ 1,650,568      $ 481,600

Long-term debt                                       400,000           723,432           323,432

Common stock                                   1,721,176           460,000           460,000

Retained earnings                                 231,176          32,592      203,768

     Total equity                                   $ 1,952,352      $ 492,592      $ 663,768

Total liabilities and equity                  $ 3,497,152      $ 2,866,592      $ 1,468,800

Note: “E” indicates estimated. The 2006 data are forecasts.

Table IC 4-2. Income Statements

                                                               2006E               2005                2004     

Sales                                                  $ 7,035,600      $ 6,034,000      $ 3,432,000

Cost of goods sold                              5,875,992      5,528,000      2,864,000

Other expenses                                     550,000      519,988         358,672

Total operating costs
     excluding depreciation                  $ 6,425,992      $ 6,047,988      $ 3,222,672

EBITDA                                              $ 609,608     ($   13,988)     $ 209,328

Depreciation                                         116,960         116,960             18,900

EBIT                                                   $ 492,648     ($ 130,948)     $ 190,428

Interest expense                                     70,008      136,012             43,828

EBT                                                     $ 422,640     ($ 266,960)     $ 146,600

Taxes (40%)                                         169,056      (106,784)a           58,640

Net income                                         $ 253,584     ($ 160,176)     $   87,960

EPS                                                     $       1.014     ($        1.602)      $       0.880

DPS                                                    $       0.220      $       0.110      $       0.220

Book value per share                          $       7.809      $       4.926      $       6.638

Stock price                                         $       12.17      $         2.25      $         8.50

Shares outstanding                                  250,000           100,000           100,000

Tax rate                                                   40.00%           40.00%           40.00%

Lease payments                                         40,000             40,000             40,000

Sinking fund payments                                       0                      0                      0

Note: “E” indicates estimated. The 2006 data are forecasts.

a The firm had sufficient taxable income in 2003 and 2004 to obtain its full tax refund in 2005.

Table IC 4-3. Ratio Analysis

                                                                                                               Industry

                                                   2006E            2005            2004      Average

Current                                                              1.2´               2.3´             2.7´

Quick                                                                  0.4´               0.8´             1.0´

Inventory turnover                                             4.7´               4.8´             6.1´

Days sales outstanding (DSO)a                         38.2               37.4            32.0

Fixed assets turnover                                         6.4´             10.0´             7.0´

Total assets turnover                                          2.1´               2.3´             2.6´

Debt ratio                                                         82.8%           54.8%         50.0%

TIE                                                                    -1.0´               4.3´             6.2´

EBITDA coverage                                                0.1´               3.0´             8.0´

Profit margin                                                     -2.7%             2.6%          3.5%

Basic earning power                                          -4.6%           13.0%         19.1%

ROA                                                                  -5.6%             6.0%          9.1%

ROE                                                                 -32.5%           13.3%         18.2%

Price/earnings                                                  -1.4´               9.7´           14.2´

Price/cash flow                                                 -5.2´               8.0´           11.0´

Market/book                                                      0.5´               1.3´             2.4´

Book value per share                                        $4.93             $6.64            n.a.

Note: “E indicates estimated. The 2006 data are forecasts.

a Calculation is based on a 365-day year.

A.              Why are ratios useful? What are the five major categories of ratios?

B.              Calculate D’Leon’s 2006 current and quick ratios based on the projected balance sheet and income statement data. What can you say about the company’s liquidity positions in 2004, 2005, and as projected for 2006? We often think of ratios as being useful (1) to managers to help run the business, (2) to bankers for credit analysis, and (3) to stockholders for stock valuation. Would these different types of analysts have an equal interest in these liquidity ratios?

C.              Calculate the 2006 inventory turnover, days sales outstanding (DSO), fixed assets turnover, and total assets turnover. How does D’Leon’s utilization of assets stack up against other firms in its industry?

D.             Calculate the 2006 debt, times-interest-earned, and EBITDA coverage ratios. How does D’Leon compare with the industry with respect to financial leverage? What can you conclude from these ratios?

E.              Calculate the 2006 profit margin, basic earning power (BEP), return on assets (ROA), and return on equity (ROE). What can you say about these ratios?

F.              Calculate the 2006 price/earnings ratio, price/cash flow ratio, and market/book ratio. Do these ratios indicate that investors are expected to have a high or low opinion of the company?

G.             Use the extended Du Pont equation to provide a summary and overview of D’Leon’s financial condition as projected for 2006. What are the firm’s major strengths and weaknesses?

H.             Use the following simplified 2006 balance sheet to show, in general terms, how an improvement in the DSO would tend to affect the stock price. For example, if the company could improve its collection procedures and thereby lower its DSO from 45.6 days to the 32-day industry average without affecting sales, how would that change “ripple through” the financial statements (shown in thousands below) and influence the stock price?

                 Accounts receivable         $ 878     Debt                                  $1,545

                 Other current assets          1,802    

                 Net fixed assets                   817     Equity                                1,952

                              Total assets   $3,497          Liabilities plus equity $3,497

I.              Does it appear that inventories could be adjusted, and, if so, how should that adjustment affect D’Leon’s profitability and stock price?

Explanation / Answer

As per rules I will answer the first 4 sub parts of the question

1:Ratios are a useful way of analysing and judging the financial position of a business. By way of ratio analysis the analyst can evaluate the financial health of a business using current and historical data. The data so derived from the statements is used for comparing the improvement in the company situation over a period of time and its performance as compared to other businesses within the same industry or the same sector to see where the company stands. Ratios help the analyst in analyzing business trends. They help in comparison of the business with competitor business and assist the management in decision making. Ratios identify the problems and weaknesses as well as strength of the business.

2:The 5 types of ratios are

1. Liquidity ratios which measure the ability of the business to pay of its short-term and current obligations.

2. Solvency ratios which compare the liabilities of the business with its Assets and equities to evaluate the long-term solvency of the business.

3. Profitability ratios which depict the profitability and Returns on Assets and equity of the business.

4. Efficiency ratios which evaluate the efficiency with which a company uses its Assets and liabilities to maximize shareholder wealth.

5. Coverage ratios which measure the ability of the business to make interest payments and meet its debt obligations

3:Current Ratio of 2006= Current Assets/ Current liabilities

= $ 2,680,112/ $ 1,144,800

=2.34

4: Quick ratio of 2006 = Current assets- Inventory/ Current liabilities

= ($ 2,680,112-1,716,480)/ $ 1,144,800

=0.84

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote