Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

German abbot Gregor Mendel published his famous pea results in 1866, to what can

ID: 272762 • Letter: G

Question

German abbot Gregor Mendel published his famous pea results in 1866, to what can be described as a general shrug. Fast forward 35 year when two scientists, Hugo de Vries and Carl Correns, independently arrived to the same conclusions and rediscovered his work. This would catch the general attention and eventually redefined the fields of genetics, evolutionary biology, and population genetics.

In 1904, William Bateson, Edith Saunders, and Reginald Punnett (of the Punnett square fame) published odd results: when selfing pea plants investigating pollen shape and flower color, the F2 generation deviated dramatically from the Mendelian 9:3:3:1 ratio expected of the F2 generation looking at 2 traits:

Discuss how and why those numbers deviate from Mendelian expectations (i.e is there any pattern of divergence in the data ?; what might be causing this divergence?) Why are these surprising or not surprising? Note that purple flowers and long pollen are the dominant phenotypes, while red flowers and round pollen are recessive.

Phenotype Observed Expected Purple, long 1528 1199 Purple, round 106 400 Red, long 117 400 Red, round 381 133 Total 2132 2132

Explanation / Answer

Null Hypothesis: 1:1:1:1

Alternative Hypothesis: 9:3:3:1

Calculation:-

Phenotype

Observed(O)

Expected(E)

(O-E)

(O-E)2

(O-E)2/E

?2

Purple, long

1528

1199

329

108241

90.276

969.024

Purple, round

106

400

-294

86436

216.090

Red, long

117

400

-283

80089

200.222

Red, round

381

133

248

61504

462.436

Total

2132

2132

Degrees of freedom: 4-1 = 3

Critical value: The table value of chi-square for 3df at 0.05 is 7.82.

As calculated value of Chi-square for 3 df 969.024< critical value 7.82, so null hypothesis re rejected, i.e there is significant difference between the observed and expected result. So, here alternative hypothesis is accepted.

These are not surprising.

Phenotype

Observed(O)

Expected(E)

(O-E)

(O-E)2

(O-E)2/E

?2

Purple, long

1528

1199

329

108241

90.276

969.024

Purple, round

106

400

-294

86436

216.090

Red, long

117

400

-283

80089

200.222

Red, round

381

133

248

61504

462.436

Total

2132

2132

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote