ctionstakeQuiz&quiz; probGuid QNAPCOA8010100000041db51700d0000acts -nolitsky-005
ID: 2909760 • Letter: C
Question
ctionstakeQuiz&quiz; probGuid QNAPCOA8010100000041db51700d0000acts -nolitsky-0051 8uckam. 1533328550465 OAAA6804016413E35 Attempts: 13 Keep the Highest: 1.3/3 4. A sports analogy for hypothesis tests A Aa In recent years, professional sports have incorporated the use of instant replay in order to dispute questionable calls by the referes. For example, in the National Basketball Association (NBA) a head coach is aliowed to challenge the referees' decision on whether a shot was made before time expired in the game. In order for the referees to reverse their original decision, the instant replay must exhibit clear evidence to th contrary. Suppose the referees rule that the last shot of the game was made after the clock had expired. The coach of the team that made the shot beleves the shot was made before time had expired, and the coach chaienges the referees' decision. The referees will review all available evidence (video taken from difflerent camera angles) and make a decision. If there is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that their original call was incorrect, the besket will count. However, if there is no clear evidence to contradict the original call the basket wont count Notice the similarty between the decision to charge a call and the decision to reject the nul hypothesis in a hypothesis test. The process involves collecting conwincing evidence that the original call or the nail hypothesis is not true. The referee only rejects the callir the instant replay exhibits cdear evidence to the contrary, just as a researcher only rejects the null hypothesis if the study results provide ciear evidence to the contrary. In both cases, not changing the call and not rejecting the nuil hypothesis doesn't mean that the original cal or the null hypothesis was correct; it means that not enough evidence was provided to the contrary To formulate the challenge using instant replay as a hypothesis test, the null hypochesis is that the player , and the alternative hypothesis is that the player tescings procedure then assumes that the player to infer that the player , with a goal of determining whether there is enough evidencr A Type I error occurs when you that they actually null hypothesis. In this case, a Type I error corresponds to the referees concluding when the player evidence to support the hypothesis that the player A Type II error occurs when you that they nul hypothesis. In this case, a Type II error corresponds to the referees concleding evidence to support the hypothesis that the player whes the player actualyExplanation / Answer
1) made the shot after the clock has expired.
2) made the shot before the clock has expired.
3)made the shot after the clock has expired.
4)made the shot before the clock has expired.
5) reject
6) true
7)don't have
8)made the shot after the clock has expired.
7) did
8) retain
9) false
10) have
11) made the shot after the clock has expired.
12) didn't
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.