Many regions in North and South Carolina and Georgia have experienced rapid popu
ID: 2949588 • Letter: M
Question
Many regions in North and South Carolina and Georgia have experienced rapid population growth over the last 10 years. It is expected that the growth will continue over the next 10 years. This has motivated many of the large grocery store chains to build new stores in the region. The Kelley’s Super Grocery Stores Inc. chain is no exception. The director of planning for Kelley’s Super Grocery Stores wants to study adding more stores in this region. He believes there are two main factors that indicate the amount families spend on groceries. The first is their income and the other is the number of people in the family. The director gathered the following sample information.
Food and income are reported in thousands of dollars per year, and the variable size refers to the number of people in the household.
a-1. Develop a correlation matrix. (Round your answers to 3 decimal places. Negative amounts should be indicated by a minus sign.)
b-1. Determine the regression equation. (Round your answer to 3 decimal places.)
b-2. How much does an additional family member add to the amount spent on food? (Round your answer to the nearest dollar amount.)
c-1. What is the value of R2? (Round your answer to 3 decimal places.)
c-2. Complete the ANOVA (Leave no cells blank - be certain to enter "0" wherever required. Round SS, MSto 4 decimal places and F to 2 decimal places.)
c-3. State the decision rule for 0.05 significance level. H0: = ?1 = ?2 = 0; H1: Not all ?i's = 0. (Round your answer to 2 decimal places.)
d-1. Complete the table given below. (Leave no cells blank - be certain to enter "0" wherever required. Round Coefficient, SE Coefficient, P to 4 decimal places and T to 2 decimal places.)c-4. Can we reject H0: = ?1 = ?2 = 0?
d-2. Would you consider deleting either of the independent variables?
Family Food Income Size 1 $ 4.24 $ 73.98 2 2 4.08 54.90 2 3 5.76 59.43 4 4 3.48 52.02 1 5 4.20 65.70 2 6 4.80 53.64 4 7 4.32 79.74 3 8 5.04 68.58 4 9 6.12 165.60 5 10 3.24 64.80 1 11 4.80 138.42 3 12 3.24 125.82 1 13 6.37 77.58 7 14 5.51 170.74 7 15 6.60 126.42 6 16 5.40 141.30 3 17 6.00 36.90 5 18 5.40 56.88 4 19 3.36 71.82 1 20 4.68 69.48 3 21 4.32 54.36 2 22 5.52 87.66 5 23 4.56 38.16 3 24 5.40 43.74 7 25 7.10 37.46 6Explanation / Answer
Part a-1
Required correlation matrix by using excel is given as below:
Correlations
Food
Income
Income
.142
1
Size
.880
.166
Part b-1
Required regression equation is given as below:
Food = 3.207 – 0.000*Income + 0.479*Size
Regression output by using excel is given below:
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R
0.880381811
R Square
0.775072133
Adjusted R Square
0.754624145
Standard Error
0.527012638
Observations
25
ANOVA
df
SS
MS
F
Significance F
Regression
2
21.05540494
10.52770247
37.9045672
7.45549E-08
Residual
22
6.110331062
0.277742321
Total
24
27.165736
Coefficients
Standard Error
t Stat
P-value
Lower 95%
Upper 95%
Intercept
3.206622882
0.293228819
10.93556523
2.31525E-10
2.598503534
3.814742231
Income
-0.000126527
0.002731651
-0.046318845
0.963474011
-0.005791624
0.005538571
Size
0.479443914
0.055791163
8.5935458
1.76342E-08
0.363740124
0.595147703
Part b-2
Another member of the family adds $1 to the food bill.
(Coefficient of variable size is given as 0.4794, and it is rounded to nearest dollar as $1.)
Part c-1
The value of the coefficient of determination or R2 is given as 0.775.
R2 = 0.775
This means, about 77.5% of the variation in the dependent variable food is explained by the independent variables income and size.
Part c-2
Required ANOVA table is given as below:
Source
df
SS
MS
F
P-value
Regression
2
21.0554
10.5277
37.90
0.00
Error
22
6.1103
0.2777
0
0
Total
24
27.1657
0
0
0
(by using excel output)
Part c-3
Decision rule: We reject the null hypothesis H0 if the P-value is less than the given level of significance or alpha value 0.05, otherwise we do not reject the null hypothesis.
F critical value = 3.443357 (by using F-table or excel)
Reject H0 if F > 3.443357
We reject the null hypothesis H0 if the test statistic F is greater than critical F value 3.443357.
Here, we get P-value = 0.00 < ? = 0.05, so we reject the null hypothesis
Part d-1
Required table of coefficients is given as below:
Coefficients
Standard Error
t Stat
P-value
Intercept
3.2066
0.2932
10.94
0.0000
Income
-0.0001
0.0027
-0.05
0.9635
Size
0.4794
0.0558
8.59
0.0000
Part d-2
Yes, we would consider deleting the independent variable income, because this variable is not statistically significant as the p-value for this variable is given as 0.9635 which is greater than ? = 0.05.
Correlations
Food
Income
Income
.142
1
Size
.880
.166
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.