Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

No Protestants are Methodists Some Christians are Methodists Some Christians are

ID: 3009013 • Letter: N

Question

No Protestants are Methodists

Some Christians are Methodists

Some Christians are not Protestants

What rule, if any, is broken?

Undistributed Middle

          

Illicit major or minor

Exclusive premises

Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise or negative premise must have a negative conclusion

Existential Fallacy

None

a.

Undistributed Middle

          

b.

Illicit major or minor

c.

Exclusive premises

d.

Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise or negative premise must have a negative conclusion

e.

Existential Fallacy

f.

None

Explanation / Answer

The first premise is a negative premise but the second one an affirmative. Since both the premises are not negative, the categorical syllogism is not Exclusive premise. Hence, the rule of Exclusive premises is broken.

Answer- (c) Exclusive premises.

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote