Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

P2 (25 Pt). On a major in the located in four locations . On a time study conduc

ID: 3050771 • Letter: P

Question

P2 (25 Pt). On a major in the located in four locations . On a time study conducted by CUSEB students the goal was to determine if there isa ti located in es to gather the parts to assemble a filter-box based on different operators aternoon, evening). The times are listed belovw Using 4x4 Latin ernoon uthe warehouse and different 4 different shift (morning, afternoon, Square confliguration in your text (page 162) table 2.1 configuration is Is there a major difference in mean assembly time? con a) c) Wha Analyze data from this study. Is there an indication that operator location is significant? r does comparison among four shifts indicates? OPERATORS 3 Shifts MorninaA 1.57 B1 2 1.52 1.68 D Afternoon B1.49 C Mid Afternoon 1.65 D 1.56 A1.58 B 1.53 D1.53 A 1.6 R venin 1.6 Theimberr ceenabone are aerages bencen3work dqys per operar

Explanation / Answer

since level of significance is not mentioned so let it is 0.05( alpha=0.05 )

number of row=number of column=number of treatment=k=4

total obsernation=n=16

grand total=G=25.04

CF=G2/n=25.04*25.04/16=39.1876

Total SS=1.572+1.492+...+1.532+1.552 - CF=39.2348-25.04*25.04/16=0.0472

Column SS=(6.192+6.332+6.32+6.222)/4 -CF=39.1909-39.1876=0.0033

row SS=39.1900-39.1876=0.0024

treatment SS=39.2197-39.1876=

follwoing ANOVA is generated

(a) p-value of treatment is less than alpha=0.05, so it is significant and it can be concluded that there is major difference in assembly time

(b)No, as p-value of location ( column ) is less than alpha=0.05

(c)there is no difference , as p-value of shift( row ) is less than alpha=0.05

Operators 1 2 3 4 row total Morning 1.57 1.52 1.63 1.56 6.28 shifts Afternoon 1.49 1.68 1.52 1.58 6.27 Mid-Afternoon 1.65 1.53 1.6 1.53 6.31 Evening 1.48 1.6 1.55 1.55 6.18 column total 6.19 6.33 6.3 6.22 25.04