Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

remain between 3.5 and 4.0% uestion 15 37.5 pts Moving Average for 30YrFixed Met

ID: 3053106 • Letter: R

Question

remain between 3.5 and 4.0% uestion 15 37.5 pts Moving Average for 30YrFixed Method Length228 NMissing o Moving Average Length 3 Accuracy Measuses MAPE 2.01208 MAD 0.10876 MSD 0.02099 Double Exponential Smoothing for 30Fixed Method Data 30ovrFixed Length 228 Smoothing Constants a (level 09 ?(trend) 0.1 Accuracy Measures MAPE 2.53128 MAD 0.13859 MSD 003730 Forecasts Perlod Forecast Lower Upper 229 3.81333 3.52938 409728 Use the output above and choose the best answer 0 The MAS) model MAD shows that the forecast misses the actual interest rate by 0.1 percent. The MAL3) model MAD shows that the forecast misses the actual interest rate by 100.08% 0 None of the answers in this question is correct lexcept for this one). The MA(3) model MAPE shows that the forecast misses the actual interest rate by 22 units D Question 16 37.5 pts In general, MAPE is an effective way to compare between two models with different units. O True O-False

Explanation / Answer

QUestion 15

Here option c is correct.

as option b is incorrect as it defined MAD in percentage terms so it is wrong here.

Here option d is incorrect as it defined MAPE in absolute terms so it is also wrong here.

for option A also expain MAD in percentage terms so it is also wrong here.

so only option C is correct here.

QUestion 16

Here as we know the MAPE as the measure which is for comparing two models in terms of percentage so yes, in general, MAPE Is an effective way to compare two models with different units. Answer is yes.