HIV tion and stigma reduction Li et al. 119 Boxplots of stigma score Control 24
ID: 3072077 • Letter: H
Question
HIV tion and stigma reduction Li et al. 119 Boxplots of stigma score Control 24 24 (b) Baseline (c) 12-Month (d) 24-Month 00e 006 002 2025 igne Sor Fig 1. Boxplots and kernel density estimation of stigma scores at baseline and the two follow-ups by group. Boxplots of stigma scores (a) and kenel density estimation curves of stigma scores for control and intervention groups at (b) baseline, (c) 12-month and (d) 24-month follow-up visits. Here, clear box in (a) and dashed line in b)-d) represent control; shaded box in (a) and solid line in (b)-(d) represent intervention. How can the 24 month distribution of HIV stigma scores for the intervention groups be described in terms of shape?Explanation / Answer
Given
The box Plot for the Stigma scores for the Control And the Intervention groups is shown.
Box Plot Analysis:-
In the Box plot for the control group we see that the mean stigma scores for remains constant while the total number of data points for 12-24 months in the control group remains the constant.
In Case of intervention the follwoing is the interpretation of the Box plot
i> The mean Stigma score because of intervention is goes down
Kernel Desity Estimation curve : Interpretation
A> For the 24 month HIV Stigma scores we observe that the desity increase with stigma score for the control group while for the intervention group the density decreases with the increase in stigma score.
Which in turm implies that for the Intervention groups The densite decreases with stigma score decreases while for the control group the density increases with the stigma score increase .
End of solution!
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.