Article “Genetically Modified Organisms” by Maxine Singer. 1. How can knowledge
ID: 3165208 • Letter: A
Question
Article “Genetically Modified Organisms” by Maxine Singer.1. How can knowledge of the genes in Xylella benefit humans? Is this an economic or societal benefit? Explain.
2. Paul R. Ehrlich made a statement about the pace of science and technology compared to the pace of societal attitudes and political institutions in terms of channeling the use of new technologies. Put this statement into your own words. You can use more than one sentence.
3. Sometimes the benefit of a GMO seems obvious. Sometimes the potencial benefit and harm are not clearly balanced. Do economic benefits weigh the same as societal or potential environmental harm? Who decides? Explain with an example. Article “Genetically Modified Organisms” by Maxine Singer.
1. How can knowledge of the genes in Xylella benefit humans? Is this an economic or societal benefit? Explain.
2. Paul R. Ehrlich made a statement about the pace of science and technology compared to the pace of societal attitudes and political institutions in terms of channeling the use of new technologies. Put this statement into your own words. You can use more than one sentence.
3. Sometimes the benefit of a GMO seems obvious. Sometimes the potencial benefit and harm are not clearly balanced. Do economic benefits weigh the same as societal or potential environmental harm? Who decides? Explain with an example. Article “Genetically Modified Organisms” by Maxine Singer.
1. How can knowledge of the genes in Xylella benefit humans? Is this an economic or societal benefit? Explain.
2. Paul R. Ehrlich made a statement about the pace of science and technology compared to the pace of societal attitudes and political institutions in terms of channeling the use of new technologies. Put this statement into your own words. You can use more than one sentence.
3. Sometimes the benefit of a GMO seems obvious. Sometimes the potencial benefit and harm are not clearly balanced. Do economic benefits weigh the same as societal or potential environmental harm? Who decides? Explain with an example.
1. How can knowledge of the genes in Xylella benefit humans? Is this an economic or societal benefit? Explain.
2. Paul R. Ehrlich made a statement about the pace of science and technology compared to the pace of societal attitudes and political institutions in terms of channeling the use of new technologies. Put this statement into your own words. You can use more than one sentence.
3. Sometimes the benefit of a GMO seems obvious. Sometimes the potencial benefit and harm are not clearly balanced. Do economic benefits weigh the same as societal or potential environmental harm? Who decides? Explain with an example.
Explanation / Answer
1. Xylellu fastidiosa is a pathogen in the orange and grapefruit. It causes chlorosis and hence, result in premature fruit formation and thus leads to the loss of crop. . This bacteria causes major problem in Brazil which is third in world orange. Information of genes that are involved in the pathogenicity of Xylellu fastidiosa could help in the loss of crop due to this bacteria and assist in breeding of novel varieties of plants. At the same time, knowledge of the genes in Xylella could help in genetic modifications with the help of modern molecular gene transfer techniques. This is economic benefit as the knowledge help in the good crop of orange in Brazil that leads to huge production of orange fruit and bring more economy to Brazil. 2. According to Paul R. Ehrlich, revolutionary changes made by the scientist in genetics and other fields are not easily accepted by the citizen of any country as it can harm their social and religious sentiments. 3. Yes, sometimes the potencial benefit and harm are not clearly balanced. The international agreements, such as Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC), Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, decide this aspect. For example, in transgenic maize , Monarch butterfly consume Cry1Ab protein from Bacillus thuringiensis that could be toxic to them. Hence, GMO maize can disturb the ecosystem, but at the same time it increases the productivity of the maize.
2. According to Paul R. Ehrlich, revolutionary changes made by the scientist in genetics and other fields are not easily accepted by the citizen of any country as it can harm their social and religious sentiments.
3. Yes, sometimes the potencial benefit and harm are not clearly balanced. The international agreements, such as Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC), Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, decide this aspect. For example, in transgenic maize , Monarch butterfly consume Cry1Ab protein from Bacillus thuringiensis that could be toxic to them. Hence, GMO maize can disturb the ecosystem, but at the same time it increases the productivity of the maize.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.