I am not sure if I am on the right track with these: The null hypothesis is that

Question

I am not sure if I am on the right track with these:

The null hypothesis is that there is not a significant difference between the three treatments?

The alternative hypothesis is that there is a significant difference between the three treatments?

For the anova, what is the interpretation of your results? (Please explain!!)

Tadpole Survival Fit Y by X of Survival Time (days by Treatment JMP One way Analysis of Survival Time (days) By Treatment 12 11 10 Control gh Low Treatment 4 Oneway Anova s Summary of Fit 0.956327 square 0.955367 Adj R Square Root Mean Square Error 0.544081 ean of Response 11.2766 Observations (or Sum Wgts) 94 Analysis of variance Sum of DF Squares Mean Square F Ratio Prob F Source 2 589.87032 Treatment 294.935 996.3217

Explanation / Answer

If the p-value is less than or equal to the alpha (p< .05), then we reject the null hypothesis, and we say the result is statistically significant.

here p-value is less than 0.0001,

clearly we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that  that there is a significant difference between the three treatments

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse I
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.