Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Suppose that an economist believes a certain macro-finance model for stock marke

ID: 3244792 • Letter: S

Question

Suppose that an economist believes a certain macro-finance model for stock market as a true model. This model gives her a prediction that the U.S. average annual real return for equity (=stock) is 2.5 percent. The sample data for 1889-1988 (100 years), however, gives her the sample mean 6.5 percent and sample variance 256 percent squared. If we can allow probability of the Type I error to be up to 5 percent, would you advise her to keep using the model? Justify your advice using statistical analysis.

Explanation / Answer

Here we have given population mean = 2.5, sample size = 100, sample mean = 6.5 sample standard deviation = 16.

(I deliberately ignore the percent unit for the calculation purpose only).

population standard deviation is not known. So we used one sample t - test for testing of hypothesis.

Null hypothesis : Ho: The model gives average annual real return for equity is 2.5.

Alternative hypothesis H1: The model does not gives average annual real return for equity is 2.5.

Solve this problem by using MINITAB, follow the procedure:

Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 1-Sample t.

In Summarized data enter Sample size, mean, and standard deviation .

Check Perform hypothesis test. In Hypothesized mean, enter 2.5.

Click Options. In Confidence level, enter 95. Click OK in each dialog box.

Session window output


MTB > Onet 100 6.5 16;
SUBC>   Test 2.5.

One-Sample T

Test of mu = 2.5 vs not = 2.5


N      Mean StDev    SE Mean    95% CI          T       P
100   6.50    16.00       1.60         (3.33, 9.67)    2.50 0.014

Decision rule: 1) If p-value < level of significance (alpha) then we reject null hypothesis

2) If p-value > level of significance (alpha) then we fail to reject null hypothesis.

Here p value = 0.014 < 0.05 so we used first rule.

That is we reject null hypothesis and accept alternative hypothesis.

Conclusion: At 5% level of significance there are sufficient evidence to say that the model does not gives average annual real return for equity is 2.5.

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote