From the Faigenbaum paper, Table 2 was the change in chest press strength signif

Question

From the Faigenbaum paper, Table 2 was the change in chest press strength significantly different between the control group and the 1 day group?

a. Yes

b. No

. From the Faigenbaum paper, Table 2 was the change in leg press strength significantly different between the control group and the 1 day group?

a. Yes

b. No

enbaum Article Table 2. One repetition maximum leg press and chest press tests at baseline and post-training Variables Group Baseline Posttraining p value M SD Mi SD Chest press (kg) Control 18.2 40 190 38 000 1-day 22.3 5.9 24.3 6.4 2-day 21.7 70 24 2 11 Leg press (kg) Control 62.2 13.6 637 126 009 1-day 60.6 17.9 69.2 17.9 2-day 56.9 24.0 71.1 22.5' Note M mean: sp standard deviation. Change in strength from baseline to posttest significantly p k D5l different from control group significance level from analysts of varianc

Explanation / Answer

1] True-

Change in chest press strength significantly different from control group & the day group since p value<0.05

2] True-

Change in leg press strength significantly different from control group & day group since p value<0.05

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse F
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.