ly company ha developed a calf d arketing departm to interpretth rts (al through
ID: 3254153 • Letter: L
Question
ly company ha developed a calf d arketing departm to interpretth rts (al through (e The Inter-netstion by the tinst ot? Explain izinterpretation. A. The interpreta O B. The interpretoton C. The interpre The inter-retalian A. The interpretation is B. The interpreta O c. The interpretoton the population of The Interpretotion by the third stoff membe that the averag ng the et? Enplai O A. The nternretation coment B. The interpretation is gain of the 00 pout C. The interpreta The interpret Kuppl-ment wil A. The inter-rel B. The Inter-netstion net cemect that the Population of O c. The interpretation is tement implies th weight gain vases. The interpretatio interpretation ot? Explain iinterpretation. A. The Inter-retotion O B. The interpre ment imple th special about the C. The Inter-netstion net cemect statement mples yield the rcherkregort that the 77 kludied gained the kiudy in this study 37 pound 95 of rage weight gain wil be betwe ifferent depending ht gain thin pound FiveExplanation / Answer
a) The interpretation is incorrect. The confidence interval addresses the mean weight gain of the population of all cows, not 95% of cows in the study.
b) Option C
c) Option B. We are 100 % sure the average weight gain of the cows in the study is 56. The 95 % confidence interval refers to the population mean.
d) Option C
e) Option C, There is not a 95% chance for another sample to have an average weight gain between 45 and 67 pounds. There is a 95% chance that another sample will have its average weight gain within two standard errors of the true mean.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.