Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

The data shown in Table 4.15 shows average weekly earnings for all adults, weekl

ID: 3299774 • Letter: T

Question

The data shown in Table 4.15 shows average weekly earnings for all adults, weekly rate of unemployment benefit for adults and the retail price index for the UK for the period 1994-2003.

Using this data comment on any trends in earnings and benefits. Do you think the RPI is the most appropriate index for deflating the unemployment benefit series?

Table 4.15- Earnings, unemployment benefit, retail price index: UK

Weekly

Average

weekly Unemployment

earnings £ benefit £

RPI 1987=100

1994

325.7

45.45

144.1

1995

336.3

46.45

149.1

1996

351.7

48.25

152.7

1997

367.6

49.15

157.5

1998

384.5

50.35

162.9

1999

400.1

51.40

165.4

2000

416.0

52.20

170.3

2001

441.0

53.05

173.3

2002

461.1

53.95

176.2

2003

472.5

54.65

181.3

Note: Unemployment benefit was replaced in October 1996 by the Jobseeker’s allowance.

Data available in file 4X9.

Weekly

Average

weekly Unemployment

earnings £ benefit £

RPI 1987=100

1994

325.7

45.45

144.1

1995

336.3

46.45

149.1

1996

351.7

48.25

152.7

1997

367.6

49.15

157.5

1998

384.5

50.35

162.9

1999

400.1

51.40

165.4

2000

416.0

52.20

170.3

2001

441.0

53.05

173.3

2002

461.1

53.95

176.2

2003

472.5

54.65

181.3

Explanation / Answer

Solution

Let

x = average weekly earnings for all adults,

y = weekly rate of unemployment benefit for adults and

z = the retail price index

Using Excel Function on correlation coefficient, the correlation coefficient, r1 between x and y is found to be 0.9831, which is quite high suggesting that there is a positive trend in earnings and benefits. This is further strengthened by the fact that r12 = 0.9665 which implies that 96.65% of variation in benefits is explained by earnings.

Similarly, Excel Function on correlation coefficient shows that the correlation coefficient, r2 between y and z is 0.9961, which is quite high suggesting that RPI can be effectively employed for deflating the unemployment benefit series. Further, the fact that r22 = 0.9922 implies that 99.22% of variation in benefits is explained by RPI.

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote