My interpretation here is it there is significant difference across employment s

Question

My interpretation here is it there is significant difference across employment status on how they would spend their money. Is this correct? Thank you!
gender how to spend gift of $500,000 Crosstabulation Count how to spend gift of $500,000 pay off my existing mortgage or if I dont own a primary donate the whole buy a vacation residence, invest it with a home at a buy one of my amount to a brokerage place of my choice outright charity of my firm choice Total gender male 13 26 39 female 21 27 67 Total 32 Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) df Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear 2.763 3.116 516 374 472 Association N of Valid Cases a. 2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5, The minimum expected count is .32.

Explanation / Answer

More appropriate interpretation :

As you have done chisquare test(test to check association between 2 variables)

Ho: There is no association between two variables

H1: There is association between two variabes.

For image 1

p value is >.05 so there is no statistically significant association between gender on how they would spend their money.

For image 2

p value is <.05 so  there is statistically significant association between employment status on how they would spend their money

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse M
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.