Suppose a researcher was interested in knowing whether “the combination of nutri
ID: 3331023 • Letter: S
Question
Suppose a researcher was interested in knowing whether “the combination of nutrition and exercise” or an “exercise intervention only” would reduce the weight (kg, after 3 months) compared to no intervention. She presented the following data: (10 points)
Group
N
Mean (SD)
Weight Change (kg) from enrollment to 3 months
F-Ratio and
p-value
Multiple Comparisons
Combination Exercise only
Combination of nutrition and exercise
15
-6.8 (4.52)
F = 12.60 (p=.024)
Exercise only
15
-2.3 (2.42)
p = .024
No Treatment
15
-0.66 (2.82)
p = .036
p = .257
Which group had the largest mean weight change after three months? What is the evidence?
Also could you explain: Mean (SD) Weight Change (kg) from enrollment to 3 months = -6.8 (4.52).
Thanks
Group
N
Mean (SD)
Weight Change (kg) from enrollment to 3 months
F-Ratio and
p-value
Multiple Comparisons
Combination Exercise only
Combination of nutrition and exercise
15
-6.8 (4.52)
F = 12.60 (p=.024)
Exercise only
15
-2.3 (2.42)
p = .024
No Treatment
15
-0.66 (2.82)
p = .036
p = .257
Explanation / Answer
t = mean weight change/sd
for Combination of nutrition and exercise
= -6.8/4.52
= -1.504424
for Exercise only
t = 2.3/ (2.42)=0.950413
No Treatment
t = -0.66/ (2.82)
=-0.234042
Since maximum |t| = 1.504424
hence Combination of nutrition and exercise group had the largest mean weight change after three months
evidence -p-value is lowest 0.024
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.