Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

THE PROBLEM: The U.S. Department of Education (USDE) issues periodic reports on

ID: 3340224 • Letter: T

Question

THE PROBLEM: The U.S. Department of Education (USDE) issues periodic reports on variables related to higher education. One concern for the country is the amount of student debt incurred by those attending universities and colleges. Does the type of institution affect debt status? The USDE investigates both the amount of debt owed and the percent of borrowed amount still owed after 12 years. Large amounts of debt make these types of purchases average percent of borrowed amount still owed after 12 years? To investigate the USDE sampled average amounts of debt owed among the 5 basic types of institutions: 1) public 2-years institutions, 2) public 4-ye institutions, 3 institutions. The data collected is shown below. it more difficult for college graduates to buy major purchases such as vehicles and homes. Delaying affects the overall US economy. Does the type of institution attended affect the institutions, 3) private non-profitinstitutions, 4) private for-profit institutions and S) other classes of YOUR TASK: Perform the necessary statistical analysis to determine whether the mean percent of borrowed amount still owed after 12 years differs among the 5 classes of higher education institutions. Public 2YR Public 4YR PrivateNP PrivateP Others 62.1 66.2 67.3 83.4 77.5 70.9 84.4 61.8 57.4 54.3 50.5 57.5 64.8 64.9 67.4 67.1 57.6 55.6 69.1 52.9 52.0 59.8 59.0 62.4 50.7 57.2 52.1 54.2 50.4 73.3 42.5 49.3 58.066.866.6 63.0 73.0 62.3 77.9 58.7 60.9 63.6 78.8 70.9 81.0 74.8 73.0 67.0 69.1 65.1 60.6 77.0 69.8 70.4 60.1 66.1 65.6 76.8 68.9 77.2 78.2 76.9 75.1 64.2

Explanation / Answer

Solution:

Here, we have to check the hypothesis or claim whether the mean percent of the borrowed amount still owed after 12 years differs among the 5 classes of higher education institutions or not. For checking this claim, we have o use single factor ANOVA or one way analysis of variance. The null and alternative hypothesis for this test is given as below:

Null hypothesis: H0: Mean percent of the borrowed amount still owed after 12 years do not differs among the 5 classes of higher education institutions.

Alternative hypothesis: Ha: Mean percent of the borrowed amount still owed after 12 years differs among the 5 classes of higher education institutions.

H0: µ1 = µ2 = µ3 = µ4 = µ5

Versus

Ha: H0 is not true.

We assume 5% level of significance ( = 0.05) for this test.

Required ANOVA test is given as below:

(Calculations are carried out by using excel data analysis.)

ANOVA: Single Factor

SUMMARY

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

Public 2YR

13

954.1

73.39230769

50.4458

Public 4YR

13

780.9

60.06923077

37.4573

Public NP

13

720.9

55.45384615

57.1910

Public P

13

877.7

67.51538462

48.4331

Others

13

910.1

70.00769231

31.1841

ANOVA

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

2819.2148

4

704.8037

15.6824

0.0000

2.5252

Within Groups

2696.5354

60

44.9423

Total

5515.7502

64

Level of significance

0.05

From the above ANOVA table, test statistic F is given as 15.6824.

P-value = 0.00 < = 0.05

So, we reject the null hypothesis that Mean percent of the borrowed amount still owed after 12 years do not differs among the 5 classes of higher education institutions.

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that Mean percent of the borrowed amount still owed after 12 years differs among the 5 classes of higher education institutions.

ANOVA: Single Factor

SUMMARY

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

Public 2YR

13

954.1

73.39230769

50.4458

Public 4YR

13

780.9

60.06923077

37.4573

Public NP

13

720.9

55.45384615

57.1910

Public P

13

877.7

67.51538462

48.4331

Others

13

910.1

70.00769231

31.1841