Consider, for example, what criteria are used in Psychology to evaluate alignmen
ID: 3352797 • Letter: C
Question
Consider, for example, what criteria are used in Psychology to evaluate alignment of research components. And in what way will future research contribute to the identity as scholar-practitioner who is dedicated to positive social change?
For this Discussion, consider criteria for evaluating alignment among the various components of a research study. Also reflect on the role as a positive social change agent through research. With these thoughts in mind:
Post
1. An explanation of the criteria you could use to evaluate alignment between data collection methods and other research components, such as the problem, purpose, research questions, and design.
2. Then, reflecting on the course content, discuss the extent to which your newly acquired research knowledge and skills can support your role as an agent of positive social change.
3. Be specific and provide an example(s).
Explanation / Answer
There are few widely acknowledged quality standards for research practice, and few definitions of what constitutes good research. The overall aim should be to describe what constitutes research, and then to use this description to develop a model of research practice and to define concepts related to its quality. The primary objective is to explore such a model and to create a multidisciplinary understanding of the generic dimensions of the quality of research practice. A graphic representation of concepts and their relationships can be used to bridge the gap between different disciplines. A concept model of research as a phenomenon can create defined concepts and their relationships. A comprehensive quality model is based on the four main areas, wh developed for describing quality issues of research practice, where the model of research as a phenomenon was useich is used to define the quality concepts. The quality model may be used for further development of elements, weights and operationalizations related to the quality of research practice in different academic fields.
Objectivity
Researchers should remain totally value free when doing research; they should try to remain totally unbiased in their investigations. I.e. Researchers are not influenced by personal feelings and experiences.
o Objectivity means that all sources of bias are minimized and that personal or subjective ideas are eliminated. The pursuit of science implies that the facts will speak for themselves, even if they turn out to be different from what the investigator hoped.
Control
o All extraneous variables need to be controlled in order to be able to establish cause (IV) and effect (DV).
Hypothesis testing
o E.g. a statement made at the beginning of an investigation that serves as a prediction and is derived from a theory. There are different types of hypotheses (null and alternative), which need to be stated in a form that can be tested (i.e. operationalized and unambiguous).
Replication
o This refers to whether a particular method and finding can be repeated with different/same people and/or on different occasions, to see if the results are similar.
o If a dramatic discovery is reported, but it cannot be replicated by other scientists it will not be accepted.
o If we get the same results over and over again under the same conditions, we can be sure of their accuracy beyond reasonable doubt.
o This gives us confidence that the results are reliable and can be used to build up a body of knowledge or a theory: vital in establishing a scientific theory.
Predictability
o We should be aiming to be able to predict future behavior from the findings of our research.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.