Case 1: Japanese automakers have long been known for the quality of their produc

Question

Case 1: Japanese automakers have long been known for the quality of their products, and especially for the efficiency of their streamlined manufacturing and supply processes. Thus, few people could have predicted how severely the destructive earthquake and tsunami that struck Japan in March 2011 would disrupt the country’s entire auto industry. Matters were further complicated by the damage the quake and floodwaters caused to one of Japan’s nuclear power plants, interrupting power supplies around the country and creating a dangerous radiation zone for miles around the plant. Following the quake and ensuing floods, most automotive factories in Japan were closed for at least several weeks, bringing to a halt about 13% of worldwide auto production. Toyota, Honda, and Mazda shut down many of their parts and manufacturing plants in Japan, and Toyota also announced plans to suspend production in at least one North American plant because of parts shortages. The company said it would make plant improvements and run training programs in its other U.S. facilities while the assembly lines were idle or run operations on a part-time basis to conserve its parts inventory. Honda, Nissan, and Subaru also reduced their North American output as they anticipated and tried to deal with expected parts shortages. Since one of the guiding principles of Lean production is to keep parts inventories as low as possible, it wasn’t long before these shortages occurred. “The supply chain in the automotive industry is so fragile,” said one legal advisor to the global auto industry. “It’s based on just-in-time principles, where you don’t have a lot of inventories built up, so you leave yourself without much margin for error when a supply interruption happens.”
Industry observers predicted that about half of Japan’s auto capacity would remain closed for at least eight weeks after the disaster, which would eventually put about one-third of worldwide production in jeopardy, as the effects of parts shortages made themselves increasingly felt in manufacturing facilities far from Japan. One auto industry research firm predicted that about five million cars that the industry had expected to sell in 2011 would never be made. By spring and summer 2011, in fact, U.S. auto dealers were reporting what one called “a lot of emptiness” in their showrooms. Many logged dwindling sales as supplies fell to as little as one-fifth their normal levels, and popular cars such as the Honda Civic and Accord went out of stock. Without new cars to sell, even trade-in sales were slowing. Honda posted a 27% decline in sales for August 2011, and Toyota anticipated a dramatic 31% profit decline for the year. Although the Japanese auto industry worked hard to quickly return to full capacity, output was still not fully restored some six months after the disaster. The disaster’s long-lasting ripple effects thus motivated industry executives to consider some changes in their vaunted manufacturing and supply operations. Traditionally, Toyota had used a single source for many parts that were common to more than one of its car models. Although the company locally sources about 85% to 90% of parts and materials needed for its North American manufacturing operations, a strategy that should make it less vulnerable to supply interruptions in Japan, it actually builds a larger proportion of its vehicles in Japan than do the other automakers, so the 2011 disaster was a serious blow. In response to these problems, Toyota’s management began work to “foolproof” the supply chain so that it could recover from major interruptions in as little as two weeks. The plan had three parts. First, Toyota would increase standardization of auto parts so all Japanese carmakers could share the supply. These parts would be made in several locations to ensure uninterrupted supply. Next, the company asked its upstream suppliers of highly specialized parts, or parts that are sourced from only one location, to hold larger inventories than they had been carrying, as and opened up new options for manufacturing such parts to reduce its dependence on single sources. Finally, and perhaps most ambitiously, Toyota took steps to make each of its global regions independent of the others in terms of parts supply, so supply chain disruptions in one area will not spill over into the operations of any other areas.
Also read these two articles. A pdf of each is posted with this assignment: • Kubota, Y. (2016, Apr 19). Japan earthquakes rattle Toyota's vulnerable supply chain; auto maker shutting 26 assembly lines and curtailed output due to production halts by two supplier plants. Wall Street Journal (Online) Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1781663223?accountid=14745 • Companies everywhere copied Japanese manufacturing. now the model is cracking. (2018, Feb 05). Dow Jones Institutional News Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1994227366?accountid=14745
Questions:
1. What are some of the advantages of the supply chain used in the Japanese auto industry before the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami? What were some of its disadvantages?
2. Did the post 2011 changes impact events after the earthquake in 2016?
3. What will the Japanese car industry need to do to recover from its most recent quality crisis? Think strategically and long term.
4. Have there been any other similar crisis in the industry worldwide recently? How were they resolved?

Explanation / Answer

1. The major advantages of the supply chain used in the Japanese auto industry before March 2011 earthquake and tsunami are:

The major disadvantages of using such system are:

2. The changes proposed by Toyota to foolproof its supply chain were:

These changes did facilitate the future preparation of the supply chain to face any type of crisis. However, we can’t comment that the changes completely saved the crisis of 2016, but it was managed to a large extent. The supply chains remained unaffected of the earthquake and the operations resumed quite early in 2016 when compared with that of 2011.

3. Initially Japanese companies used to be very stringent with the quality standards of the parts and sub-parts of its supply chain. But with the crisis of 2011 and business stagnation for over 8 months, the Japanese became liberal with the quality standards so that the supply chain is not impacted. This strategy however hovered another crisis in the near future-i.e. it led to the quality crisis which this industry is currently facing.

Toyota needs to formulate and implement regular quality checks in its production line and supply chain. The regular quality checks would facilitate the identification of any type of defect in its nascent stage, which will be easier to tackle. Regular audits must be conducted to keep the quality adherence in place. Also, the technology advancement must be communicated down the line, so that all employees are aware of the current technology being implemented and its potential risk identification and mitigation measures.

4. In 2017, US automobile market faced a similar crisis where an acute problem was witnessed in Hyundai Sonata cars’ engines. Around 1.5 million cars were recalled to address the faulty engine quality concerns.

The company is still addressing the crisis. The cars have been called back for an inspection. After inspection, the company would replace the faulty engine parts.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse C
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.