4. (35 pts) An investor has $1,000 to invest into two types of share. If he inve
ID: 3358550 • Letter: 4
Question
Explanation / Answer
1)
Expected outcome of share A = $2m * 0.7 + $0 * 0.3 = $1.4m
Expected outcome of share B = $2(1000-m) * 0.6 + $0 * 0.4 = $1200 - $1.2m
Total expected outcome of investment = $1.4m + $1200 - $1.2m = $1200 + $0.2m
As, m can vary between $0 and $1000, the range of expected outcomes is ($1200, $1400)
b.
Expected outcome of share A = log(2m+3000) * 0.7 + log(0+3000) * 0.3 = 0.7log(2m+3000) + 0.3log(3000)
Expected outcome of share B = log(2(1000-m)+3000) * 0.6 + log(0+3000) * 0.4 = 0.6log(5000-2m) + 0.4log(3000)
Total expected outcome, E = 0.7log(2m+3000) + 0.6log(5000-2m) + 0.7log(3000)
Differentiating wrt m and equating with 0, we get
dE/dm = [2*0.7 / (2m+3000) ] - [2*0.6 / (5000-2m) ] = 0
1.4 (5000 - 2m) - 1.2 (2m + 3000) = 0
m (2.4 + 2.8) = 1.4 * 5000 - 1.2 * 3000
m = 3400 / 5.2 = 653.8462
So, the optimal value of m is $653.8462
c.
Expected outcome of share A = (2m+3000)2 * 0.7 + (0+3000)2 * 0.3 = 0.7(2m+3000)2 + 0.3(3000)2
Expected outcome of share B = (2(1000-m)+3000)2 * 0.6 + (0+3000)2 * 0.4 = 0.6(5000-2m)2 + 0.4(3000)2
Total expected outcome, E = 0.7(2m+3000)2 + 0.6(5000-2m)2 + 0.7(3000)2
Differentiating wrt m and equating with 0, we get
dE/dm = 2*2*0.7(2m+3000) - 2*2*0.6(5000-2m) = 0
1.4m + 2100 - 3000 + 1.2m = 0
2.6m = -900
m = -346.1538
As, optimal value of m is negative, which is not feasible. So, the optimal solution does not exist for this utility function.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.