Suppose our claim is \"Border collies vary more than 1 inch in length.\" If we f

Question

Suppose our claim is

"Border collies vary more than 1 inch in length."  

If we fail to reject the null-hypothesis,

which of the following is the correct conclusion?

There is not sufficient evidence

to warrant rejection of the claim

that  border collies  vary more than 1 inch  in length.

There is sufficient evidence

to support the claim that border collies vary more than 1 inch in length.

There is sufficient evidence to

warrant rejection of the claim

that

border collies vary more than 1 inch in length.

There is not sufficient evidence to support the

claim that border collies  vary more than 1 inch  in length.

There is not sufficient evidence

to warrant rejection of the claim

that  border collies  vary more than 1 inch  in length.

There is sufficient evidence

to support the claim that border collies vary more than 1 inch in length.

There is sufficient evidence to

warrant rejection of the claim

that

border collies vary more than 1 inch in length.

There is not sufficient evidence to support the

claim that border collies  vary more than 1 inch  in length.

Explanation / Answer

The correct answer is option-D

Correct Conclusion:

There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that border collies  vary more than 1 inch  in length.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse S
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.