Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

please answer all.... Scores /10 21. Chapter 11, Problems 22 A study showed that

ID: 3362256 • Letter: P

Question

please answer all....

Scores /10 21. Chapter 11, Problems 22 A study showed that students had more academic problems following nights with less than average sleep compared to nights with more than average sleep (Gillen-O'Neel, Huynh, & Fuligni, 2013). Suppose a researcher is attempting to replicate this study using a sample of n-8 college freshmen. Each student records the amount of study time and amount of sleep each night and reports the number of academic problems each day. The following data show the results from the study. Following Nights Following Nights with Above with Below Student Average Sleep Average Sleep 10 13 6 10 13 5 In the above data the participants with the highest scores in the more-sleep condition also had the highest scores in the less-sleep condition. Similarty, participants with the lowest scores in the first condition also had the lowest scores in the second condition. To construct the following data, the same data was used but the scores in treatment 2 were scrambled to eliminate the consistency of the individual differences Number of Academic Problems Following Nights Following Nights with Above with Below Student Average Sleep Average Sleep

Explanation / Answer

Result:

Part 1

S^2p = 12.00

S=1.73

t statistic=-1.15

Critical t= ±2.145

Fail to reject Ho. There is no significant difference.

Pooled-Variance t Test for the Difference Between Two Means

(assumes equal population variances)

Data

Hypothesized Difference

0

Level of Significance

0.05

Population 1 Sample

Sample Size

8

Sample Mean

7

Sample Standard Deviation

3.11677489

Population 2 Sample

Sample Size

8

Sample Mean

9

Sample Standard Deviation

3.77964473

Intermediate Calculations

Population 1 Sample Degrees of Freedom

7

Population 2 Sample Degrees of Freedom

7

Total Degrees of Freedom

14

Pooled Variance

12.0000

Standard Error

1.7321

Difference in Sample Means

-2.0000

t Test Statistic

-1.1547

Two-Tail Test

Lower Critical Value

-2.1448

Upper Critical Value

2.1448

p-Value

0.2675

Do not reject the null hypothesis

Part2

variance = 3.71

standard error =0.68

t statistic=-2.94

Critical t= ±2.365

Reject Ho. There is a significant difference.

Paired t Test

Data

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

Level of significance

0.05

Intermediate Calculations

Sample Size

8

DBar

-2.0000

Degrees of Freedom

7

SD

1.9272

Standard Error

0.6814

t Test Statistic

-2.9352

Two-Tail Test

Lower Critical Value

-2.3646

Upper Critical Value

2.3646

p-Value

0.0219

Reject the null hypothesis

Pooled-Variance t Test for the Difference Between Two Means

(assumes equal population variances)

Data

Hypothesized Difference

0

Level of Significance

0.05

Population 1 Sample

Sample Size

8

Sample Mean

7

Sample Standard Deviation

3.11677489

Population 2 Sample

Sample Size

8

Sample Mean

9

Sample Standard Deviation

3.77964473

Intermediate Calculations

Population 1 Sample Degrees of Freedom

7

Population 2 Sample Degrees of Freedom

7

Total Degrees of Freedom

14

Pooled Variance

12.0000

Standard Error

1.7321

Difference in Sample Means

-2.0000

t Test Statistic

-1.1547

Two-Tail Test

Lower Critical Value

-2.1448

Upper Critical Value

2.1448

p-Value

0.2675

Do not reject the null hypothesis